On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:19:36PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> No, I revoke that suggestion. The answer is simply to turn off front or
> back text
> visibility, then the module text will not be selected and the selection
> clarification menu
> frequency goes down drastically.
That's exactl
On 08/05/2013 04:01 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> Jean-Pierre,
>
> Rev 4271 probably reverses out a change you made to my original selection
> clarification work.
>
> I found I could not move a module text reference with M hotkey if it was
> tucked under a
> neighboring module.
>
> My change re
On 5 August 2013 14:08, Adam Wolf wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> (Good work on the Windows stuff, by the way.)
>
> The patch is here:
>
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13794
>
> I can merge it in if you want, but feel free to do it yourself as well.
>
> The Linux PPA replacement work goes wel
On 22 July 2013 20:02, jp charras wrote:
> I released the first draft of Pl_Editor, a new tool to create customized
> title blocks.
> Some features are still missing (like hot keys and undo/redo commands) but
> it should be very usable.
>
> The documentation is also released. Please read it.
>
>
Jean-Pierre,
Rev 4271 probably reverses out a change you made to my original selection
clarification work.
I found I could not move a module text reference with M hotkey if it was tucked
under a
neighboring module.
My change reverts to how it was originally written, however, it causes more
po
On 08/05/2013 11:45 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:29:40AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>> Gosh, well maybe not. After recompiling I could not duplicate it.
>
> Some kind of heisenbug, maybe? Even the autoscrolling issue I had with
> eeschema is not reproducible on e
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:29:40AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> Gosh, well maybe not. After recompiling I could not duplicate it.
Some kind of heisenbug, maybe? Even the autoscrolling issue I had with
eeschema is not reproducible on every machine (I suspect some timing
relationship and/or even
On 08/05/2013 10:14 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 08/03/2013 01:01 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>> Jean-Pierre
>>
>> I committed a big edit recently. Did not have time to test it extensively.
>>
>> Mildly concerned about eeschema: find operation, and its use of the
>> GetScreen() stuff,
>> which
Hi Camille,
On 08/05/2013 05:25 PM, Camille Delbegue wrote:
This patch remove a Clang warning and add a missing dependency to boost
in cmake file.
Thanks for the patch, it is already applied (rev 4229).
Kind regards,
Orson
___
Mailing list: https://
Hi,
This patch remove a Clang warning and add a missing dependency to boost in
cmake file.
Regards
--
Camille
kicad-gal.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.lau
On 08/03/2013 01:01 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> Jean-Pierre
>
> I committed a big edit recently. Did not have time to test it extensively.
>
> Mildly concerned about eeschema: find operation, and its use of the
> GetScreen() stuff,
> which partially went away.
Seems I did break eeschema sing
Hi Brian,
(Good work on the Windows stuff, by the way.)
The patch is here:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13794
I can merge it in if you want, but feel free to do it yourself as well.
The Linux PPA replacement work goes well, but slowly due to other
requirements--I'll post as soon a
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 03:49:27PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> KISYSMOD contains the platform specific portion of the path your "KiCad
> system" footprint
> libraries. It can be used to achieve cross platform neutrality within a
> potentially
> platforn neutral, i.e. 'common' fp library tabl
On 5 August 2013 07:54, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
> I'm really amazed to see what you got here. I'm a little off the project
> lately (just reading your efforts and changes weekly while doing
> non-stop-work, in the hope to be back soon).
>
> I felt that I had to write and say THANKS. You're
On 5 August 2013 06:49, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> I would think you can put such a file into our CMakeModules dir and it
> will be used
> instead of an identically named one installed with CMake. Yours sound
> like linux related
> edits, so those would have to be merged with any similar construct
On 5 August 2013 00:51, Adam Wolf wrote:
> This is a minor aside. What's all involved in including a custom cmake
> module in a project? I fixed FindPythonLibs and another Python module for
> cmake a few months ago, because right now those two stock modules don't
> work on Fedora or Ubuntu--whi
16 matches
Mail list logo
