On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Andrea serr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tested your new Interactive Router, it's great!
I had few crash, but I saved often! It stable enough to create a
professional board.
Any extra details you can give would be useful, especially if the
crashes are
13/07/14 11:28, Javier Serrano kirjoitti:
There is a group of people doing layout full-time as a service for the
whole of CERN. Maybe it is because most designs contain many
high-speed lines with specific layout requirements which autorouters
struggle with. I'd be interested in the opinion
I've been busy with other work - but wanted to offer an update.
For debugging the crash - the PGM_KICAD entries do not apply since
Kicad.exe itself does not crash - just pcbnew.I do not see that pcbnew
uses the PGM_KICAD exit routines here - as PGM_KICAD destroyers work fine
with kicad.exe.
No idea.
I don't see the crash in the output. It would be prudent to have the crash
text and the
debug text in the same stream if possible, that way it might infer sequence of
events.
There's not much remaining in program execution before the end. The only
additional
printf()'s you might
On 07/13/2014 10:28 AM, Javier Serrano wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Andrea serr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I tested your new Interactive Router, it's great!
I had few crash, but I saved often! It stable enough to create a
professional board.
Any extra details you can give would be
5 matches
Mail list logo
