Le 23/12/2016 à 00:30, Dino Ghilardi a écrit :
> Il 22/12/2016 13:03, Nox ha scritto:
>> Hello Dino,
>>
>> Afaik the undo/redo system of Eeschema does not support "batching" of
>> changes natively. Generally
>> speaking the undo/redo system of Eeschema could need some attention but I do
>> not
In this case (user errors/oversight) it really makes no sense to give
information which might only be helpful to developers. I think any
organized way of dealing with messages for users (or even messages
for developers) would be greatly appreciated. As things are I'm sure
I'm not helping either -
There's another little project I'd like to work on in the month or so I
have off now:
https://misc.c4757p.com/outline-error.png
We have way too many error messages like that. That is, in my opinion,
completely unacceptable. It's confusing and intimidating to anyone
unfamiliar with kicad's...
Il 22/12/2016 13:03, Nox ha scritto:
Hello Dino,
Afaik the undo/redo system of Eeschema does not support "batching" of
changes natively. Generally speaking the undo/redo system of Eeschema
could need some attention but I do not know how worthwhile it is
considering the announced refac. There
Better but there are still a few minor issues:
There are some inconsistent spacing issues which I've highlighted in the
attached image.
I don't think you should put the text to the left of the checkbox. It
just look out of place. I don't recall ever seeing this done before.
Now that you've
Hello, Steven!
On 2016-12-22 15:01, Strontium wrote:
> My 2c for what its worth,
> To handle what Kasper suggests, one would have two standard keys:
> "MPN" and "MANUFACTURER", or a standard field format for MPN that can
> hold both the manufacturer and part number.
>
> The issue with the keys
My 2c for what its worth,
The properties we are talking about are just KEY:Value pairs, and i
don't think its wise to change from that. Its simple and easily handles
most possibilities.
What I think would be useful however is a customisable "set" of standard
"keys", So when you go into the
Hello Dino,
Afaik the undo/redo system of Eeschema does not support "batching" of
changes natively. Generally speaking the undo/redo system of Eeschema
could need some attention but I do not know how worthwhile it is
considering the announced refac. There is a way to archive it iirc
Il 20/12/2016 09:59, jp charras ha scritto:
Le 08/11/2016 à 01:29, Dino Ghilardi a écrit :
Hello everyone,
Thanks for the comments on this tool and the video.
...
Hi Dino,
Have you a more recent version of your tool, including a few enhancements you
have listed?
This tool is very
9 matches
Mail list logo