Re: [Kicad-developers] [FEATURE] Component table viewer

Hi Oliver, On 06/05/17 12:13, Oliver Walters wrote: And it just so happens that in this schematic NO components have been edited to include these default fields/values, so, they don't show up in the component table. I have a patch to fix this now - if a field is empty and a temp

Re: [Kicad-developers] [FEATURE] Component table viewer

> > Perhaps one feature request regarding custom fields would be (if possible) > to select which field is used for grouping components, instead of just the > value field. Either a custom field or one of the standard ones like > footprint name or symbol name. Think editing all 0402 resistors, or all

Re: [Kicad-developers] [FEATURE] Component table viewer

> > And it just so happens that in this schematic NO components have been > edited to include these default fields/values, so, they don't show up in > the component table. I have a patch to fix this now - if a field is empty and a template value exists, that is placed there instead. > Also, edi

Re: [Kicad-developers] [FEATURE] Component table viewer

Hi Oliver! I also tried the new component table viewer, and think that it looks very promising! I'm switching over from Altium which makes extensive use of List and Property dock panels, so I would like to provide some feedback: * There should be a warning if there are uncommitted changes. Right

Re: [Kicad-developers] ogltest and OSX nightlies

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:24:38PM +0200, Bernhard Stegmaier wrote: > … hmm, not really sure, just a guess. > It could have started to break with that change: > > https://git.launchpad.net/kicad/commit/utils/kicad-ogltest/CMakeLists.txt?id=7b4ea2a382f949150ea4f145ac9f4d2a59ec2591 > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] ogltest and OSX nightlies

… hmm, not really sure, just a guess. It could have started to break with that change: https://git.launchpad.net/kicad/commit/utils/kicad-ogltest/CMakeLists.txt?id=7b4ea2a382f949150ea4f145ac9f4d2a59ec2591

Re: [Kicad-developers] ogltest and OSX nightlies

Hi, this seems to be quite incomplete. It is the last step making the bundle relocatable that fails. First, what is kicad-ogltest supposed to be? A real application bundle or just a standalone (command line) binary? For a real application bundle you will probably need a Info.plist like for the

[Kicad-developers] ogltest and OSX nightlies

Hi, Apologies for my absense. I'm looking into the issue with macOS nightles not building, which appears to be because of kicad-ogltest which I added a while ago. I'm still really busy and am having trouble finding real time for this, but I want to get the nightlies going again. If I can't actual

Re: [Kicad-developers] [FEATURE] Component table viewer

I would add a separate "Apply" button. I could spend an hour just filling part numbers and descriptions, and it makes me uncomfortable to have all those changes stored only in RAM. I can hit "Ok" to close and apply changes, but then I have to open the viewer again. And a minor quirk, after a "Regr

Re: [Kicad-developers] Move point on pcbnew

Too bad! Here you can find a google drive folder with the two small video. Enjoy, Carlo https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-AbX0GoNzEPRjFSY19qQ0JjeFE On May 3, 2017 10:15 PM, "Carlo Maragno" wrote: > Hi Guys, > > While I was using an old developer version of Kicad (the build date was > 2

Re: [Kicad-developers] [FEATURE] Component table viewer

Perhaps one feature request regarding custom fields would be (if possible) to select which field is used for grouping components, instead of just the value field. Either a custom field or one of the standard ones like footprint name or symbol name. Think editing all 0402 resistors, or all the conne

Re: [Kicad-developers] [FEATURE] Component table viewer

Oliver, This is one of my components: http://i.imgur.com/QXyCXXt.png This is the component table: http://i.imgur.com/F2WTRC2.png The MFG, MPN or EQUIVOK fields in the component aren't shown in the table! And in doing that I worked out my problem :) I have MFG/MPN/EQUIVOK defined as "Default F

Re: [Kicad-developers] [FEATURE] Component table viewer

Steven, Unless you mean something different to what I think "custom fields" means, then this is already the case - any extra fields (beyond REFERENCE / FOOTPRINT / DATSHEET / VALUE) are preesnt to be edited in the table... On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Strontium wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > Just

Re: [Kicad-developers] [FEATURE] Component table viewer

Hi Oliver, Just had a chance to check out your component table viewer, its nice. Great work. Is it on your roadmap to be able to view/edit a components custom fields? Regards, Steven On 03/05/17 05:35, Oliver Walters wrote: Wayne, Thanks for merging! I will address those points at some s

Re: [Kicad-developers] Move point on pcbnew

The attachments got scrubbed (probably too large), i'd recommend you upload the videos to youtube or some other video sharing site. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Carlo Maragno wrote: > Hi there, > > I done some tests, including a full system wipe and the behavior is still > the same. I tried t

Re: [Kicad-developers] Move point on pcbnew

Hi there, I done some tests, including a full system wipe and the behavior is still the same. I tried to compile 096d9f & c70adc and I got similar results. In the attachments you can find two video: the kicad_bug one was done with 096d9f while the kicad_working one was done on 7034ea. Cheers, Ca