[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Add empty eeschema page layout for Eagle schematic import. Bug #1729722

2018-02-02 Thread Russell Oliver
Attached is a patch that adds an empty layout using the same method as the SetDefaultLayout function, which is then called by the Eagle schematic plugin to leave only the imported frame visible. https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1729722 Kind Regards Russell 0001-Add-empty-eeschema-page-layo

Re: [Kicad-developers] GUI garbage...?

2018-02-02 Thread Nick Østergaard
are you sure you didn't rebuild wxpython with gtk2? Den 3. feb. 2018 00.55 skrev "Clemens Koller" : > Hi, Chris! > > I don't run into the issues on Arch Linux. No special tweaks. Installed > packages are i.e.: > > $ pacman -Q | grep "wx" > wxformbuilder-svn 3.5.2.RC2.r2225-1 > wxgtk-common 3.0.3.

Re: [Kicad-developers] GUI garbage...?

2018-02-02 Thread Clemens Koller
Hi, Chris! I don't run into the issues on Arch Linux. No special tweaks. Installed packages are i.e.: $ pacman -Q | grep "wx" wxformbuilder-svn 3.5.2.RC2.r2225-1 wxgtk-common 3.0.3.1-11 wxgtk2 3.0.3.1-11 wxgtk2.8 2.8.12.1-6 wxgtk3 3.0.3.1-11 wxpython 3.0.2.0-7 wxpython2.8 2.8.12.1-3 About KiCa

Re: [Kicad-developers] GUI garbage...?

2018-02-02 Thread Chris Pavlina
Okay, I can confirm this works, looks like they did switch wxpython from gtk2 to gtk3. Really annoying, given gtk2 and gtk3 are different packages libraries that use them ought to be too... Sorry for the noise, guess my distro is to blame. On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 11:55:46PM +0200, Janis Skujenie

Re: [Kicad-developers] GUI garbage...?

2018-02-02 Thread Janis Skujenieks
I don't know exactly, but in forum post he resolved by downgrading wxpython to 3.0.2.0-6. https://forum.kicad.info/t/arch-linux-problem-with-wxpython-3-0-2-0-7-reverting-to-3-0-2-0-6-works-fine-kicad-nightly/9493 I haven't had time to upgrade my system. On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Chris Pav

Re: [Kicad-developers] GUI garbage...?

2018-02-02 Thread Chris Pavlina
I'm confused - nickoe comments on that bug to rebuild with gtk2, but both the version info posted in the bug report and my own system indicate gtk2... On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 11:32:58PM +0200, Janis Skujenieks wrote: > I think you may have this problem > https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/17467

Re: [Kicad-developers] GUI garbage...?

2018-02-02 Thread Janis Skujenieks
I think you may have this problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1746753 On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Mostly empty toolbars, one missing toolbar, and a completely black, > blank schematic. > > Arch Linux > gtk2 2.24.32-1 > wxgtk2 3.0.3.1-11 > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2

Re: [Kicad-developers] GUI garbage...?

2018-02-02 Thread Chris Pavlina
Mostly empty toolbars, one missing toolbar, and a completely black, blank schematic. Arch Linux gtk2 2.24.32-1 wxgtk2 3.0.3.1-11 On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 03:53:03PM -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote: > On 2018-02-02 03:24 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > > https://misc.c4757p.com/kicad-is-very-broken.png > > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] GUI garbage...?

2018-02-02 Thread Kevin Cozens
On 2018-02-02 03:24 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: https://misc.c4757p.com/kicad-is-very-broken.png Anyone have any idea what could possibly cause this...? What are we supposed to see in that image? Which operating system are you using? -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds ma

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Allow OpenCASCADE standard edition

2018-02-02 Thread Thomas Figueroa
Hey Seth, I was able to successfully use OpenCascade 7.1 and export using kicad2step! Now to find out why… -Thomas From: Seth Hillbrand Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 11:10 AM To: Thomas Figueroa Cc: kicad-developers@lists.launc

[Kicad-developers] GUI garbage...?

2018-02-02 Thread Chris Pavlina
Well, I was going to spend this weekend working on KiCad again, but I can't do much while this is going on... https://misc.c4757p.com/kicad-is-very-broken.png Anyone have any idea what could possibly cause this...? It's all good until I launch pcbnew, then the whole thing falls apart. -- Chris

Re: [Kicad-developers] Dealing with multifunction pins (Symbol)

2018-02-02 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Not until the v6 release. There just was not enough time to work on the new file formats during the v5 cycle. On 02/02/2018 08:15 AM, Augusto Fraga Giachero wrote: Hi Wayne, This means that this will be addressed after the Kicad 5 release? Thanks, Augusto Fraga Giachero. On 30-01-2018 14:15

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Allow OpenCASCADE standard edition

2018-02-02 Thread Seth Hillbrand
Hi Nick- Thanks. Can you clear your build directory, re-run your Cmake command and send the full output? The snippet suggests that it is finding a library in your kicad-source-mirror directory. -Seth 2018-02-01 13:03 GMT-08:00 Nick Østergaard : > Hi Seth > > The second patch seems more broken

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Allow OpenCASCADE standard edition

2018-02-02 Thread Seth Hillbrand
Hi Thomas- I located a windows machine to try this. I suspect that this is an artifact of OpenCascade 7.2. Can you test with OpenCascade 7.1? I haven't tracked down exactly what changed in 7.2 but it appears that 7.0 and 7.1 work but 7.2 will require additional work in kicad2step. Of note, OCC

[Kicad-developers] OT: Re: Dealing with multifunction pins (Symbol)

2018-02-02 Thread Clemens Koller
Hi, Augusto! On 2018-02-02 14:11, Augusto Fraga Giachero wrote: > Yes, this idea would only work for small and medium sized ICs, but would > be nice to not depend on external tools besides Kicad and its symbol > libraries to do it. I fully agree with you. External tools are off course optional.

Re: [Kicad-developers] Dealing with multifunction pins (Symbol)

2018-02-02 Thread Augusto Fraga Giachero
Hi Wayne, This means that this will be addressed after the Kicad 5 release? Thanks, Augusto Fraga Giachero. On 30-01-2018 14:15, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: Augusto, Most of this is going to be addressed during the next development cycle when the new symbol library and schematic file format are im

Re: [Kicad-developers] Dealing with multifunction pins (Symbol)

2018-02-02 Thread Augusto Fraga Giachero
Hi Clemens, Yes, this idea would only work for small and medium sized ICs, but would be nice to not depend on external tools besides Kicad and its symbol libraries to do it. Anyway, a tabled based entry might be a good solution. I'm glad to see that this issue is a concern among Kicad devs.