Neat idea, Russell!
In theory, this is possible. In practice, there are many challenges to
overcome.
The internal representation of the schematic does not resemble the netlist
that is given to PcbNew.
So, a PcbNew netlist (whether generated by SKIDL or anything else) would
have to be "imported"
Hi All,
First off congratulations to everyone involved with KiCon for making
it a success and the great progress that is happening with Kicad at
the moment.
I've been following Dave Vandenbout's work on SKIDL [1] a while but
his talk [2] at the conference on SKIDL really showed the power that
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for cranking through all these features! It's quite impressive
seeing the progress :-)
I gave bus unfolding a try and noticed a few issues:
1) It looks like in your branch, bus unfolding is only possible while
already in the "draw bus" tool. It was originally intended to be
Am 2019-05-02 16:51, schrieb Jeff Young:
The eeschema modern toolset is “finished”.
It can be found at origin/eemodern. A bit of testing before merging
might be in order….
Cheers,
Jeff.
Note: this is just the schematic editor. The symbol editor will
follow.
Awesome work here Jeff! This
On 4/30/19 4:36 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
> We had talked earlier about throwing the wxWidgets UTF8 compile switch to get
> rid of our wxString re-entrancy problems. However, I noticed that the 6.0
> work packages doc includes an item for std::string-ization of the BOARD.
> (While a lot more
Where in Colorado are you?
I grew up in Glenwood Springs and we keep a condo in Breckenridge.
> On 2 May 2019, at 22:40, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
>
> On 02/05/2019 15:51, Jeff Young wrote:
>> The eeschema modern toolset is “finished”.
>>
>> It can be found at origin/eemodern. A bit of
On 02/05/2019 07:06, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Hey Tom,
>
> I finally got around to testing this. I could not get it to build on
> windows or linux. I'm getting the following compiler error on both 32
> and 64 bit windows and linux builds:
>
>
On 02/05/2019 15:51, Jeff Young wrote:
> The eeschema modern toolset is “finished”.
>
> It can be found at origin/eemodern. A bit of testing before merging might be
> in order….
>
Jeff,
Wow, I'm speechless. You did it lightning fast. I'll try to compile it
in the evening and give you some
The eeschema modern toolset is “finished”.
It can be found at origin/eemodern. A bit of testing before merging might be
in order….
Cheers,
Jeff.
Note: this is just the schematic editor. The symbol editor will follow.
___
Mailing list:
I should have some time to take it for a test spin tomorrow.
Wayne
On 5/2/19 4:51 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
> The eeschema modern toolset is “finished”.
>
> It can be found at origin/eemodern. A bit of testing before merging might be
> in order….
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
> Note: this is just the
Bits pushed.
Main parts are now in sch_line_drawing_tool.cpp. BUS_UNFOLD_MENU starts on
line 96, it’s added to the context menu at line 222, and the commands are
dispatched starting at line 674.
BTW: there are some synthetic KICAD_T types that can be used for fishing out
sub-types of
(I also got my simple test working by renaming my bus label from "D0..31" to
"D[0..31]”.)
> On 2 May 2019, at 20:39, Jeff Young wrote:
>
> Ha! Works right out of the box.
>
> I’ll push it to origin/eemodern shortly so you can have a look.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeff.
>
>
>> On 2 May 2019, at
Ha! Works right out of the box.
I’ll push it to origin/eemodern shortly so you can have a look.
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 2 May 2019, at 20:07, Jon Evans wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
> You can test unfolding using one of the demo projects that uses buses (for
> example: video)
>
> -Jon
>
> On Thu, May
Reece,
It sounds like you are describing DFM not DRC. There is some overlap
between the two concepts but they not the same thing. This is also
something different that what Jon's survey is attempting to determine.
The new constraint system planned for v6 will support import/export and
should
Hi Jeff,
You can test unfolding using one of the demo projects that uses buses (for
example: video)
-Jon
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 2:57 PM Jeff Young wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> I’ve moved the bus unfolding menu to the modern toolkit and I’m trying to
> test it. How do I give a bus connections? I
I appreciate the feedback, Reece! If you have time, it would make my life
easier if you could put it in the survey. I am going to be sorting and
collating all the feedback and if it comes in via email, there's a chance
it will get lost.
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 3:04 PM Reece Pollack wrote:
> My
My biggest gripe is the inability to import a DRC configuration from a PCB fab
company.
Many fabs provide Eagle DRC files customized to their various offerings. With
KiCad I either have to customize each project or create template files before I
start a project. If I want to run a DRC using
Hi Jon,
I’ve moved the bus unfolding menu to the modern toolkit and I’m trying to test
it. How do I give a bus connections? I tried a wire2bus entry with a label on
the wire, and connecting the wire to an annotated component, and giving the bus
a label of “D0..D31”, but none of those worked.
Please share it far and wide, I have already posted it to the forums.
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 1:50 PM Adam Wolf
wrote:
> Do you mind if we share this to other KiCad users?
>
> Adam
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:55 AM Jon Evans wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The development team would like
I don't have any issues with additional feedback. @Jon, are you OK with
that.
Wayne
On 5/2/19 1:50 PM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> Do you mind if we share this to other KiCad users?
>
> Adam
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:55 AM Jon Evans wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The development team would like
Do you mind if we share this to other KiCad users?
Adam
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:55 AM Jon Evans wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The development team would like feedback from users on the ERC and DRC
> functionality of KiCad. We'd like to know what KiCad gets right, and what
> features are missing
I had a quick look at this. I'm not sure expanding all search hits to show sub
units is the best fix here. It means for the 7400 series that you can fit only
3 or 4 search hits in the dialog at default size.
I think it would be reasonable to expand only as far as the LIBID nodes.
Cheers,
On 2 May 2019 17:47:59 BST, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
>Am 2019-05-02 12:37, schrieb Henner Zeller:
>> On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 09:31, Henner Zeller wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 09:25, Seth Hillbrand
>>> wrote:
>
>Any event, anyone see issues with the center spiral patch before it is
Hi all,
The development team would like feedback from users on the ERC and DRC
functionality of KiCad. We'd like to know what KiCad gets right, and what
features are missing that you need.
The data from this anonymous survey will help us prioritize development
efforts related to ERC and DRC.
Am 2019-05-02 12:37, schrieb Henner Zeller:
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 09:31, Henner Zeller wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 09:25, Seth Hillbrand
wrote:
>
> Hmmm... cache will be local to each core, so the we'll probably get
> speed up by dividing the image into quadrants based on the number of
>
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 09:31, Henner Zeller wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 09:25, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> >
> > Am 2019-05-02 12:18, schrieb Henner Zeller:
> > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 20:24, Henner Zeller wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >> so here one digit patch.
> > >>
> > >> Problem Symptom:
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 09:25, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
>
> Am 2019-05-02 12:18, schrieb Henner Zeller:
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 20:24, Henner Zeller wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> so here one digit patch.
> >>
> >> Problem Symptom: in the schematic symbol chooser, if you search for an
> >> exact match
Am 2019-05-02 12:18, schrieb Henner Zeller:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 20:24, Henner Zeller wrote:
Hi,
so here one digit patch.
Problem Symptom: in the schematic symbol chooser, if you search for an
exact match of a component with multiple units, it is not selected.
For instance, search for
Hey Henner,
On 5/2/19 12:18 PM, Henner Zeller wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 20:24, Henner Zeller wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> so here one digit patch.
>>
>> Problem Symptom: in the schematic symbol chooser, if you search for an
>> exact match of a component with multiple units, it is not selected.
>>
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 20:24, Henner Zeller wrote:
>
> Hi,
> so here one digit patch.
>
> Problem Symptom: in the schematic symbol chooser, if you search for an
> exact match of a component with multiple units, it is not selected.
> For instance, search for
>
>74LS00
>
> The scored element is
Hey Tom,
I finally got around to testing this. I could not get it to build on
windows or linux. I'm getting the following compiler error on both 32
and 64 bit windows and linux builds:
E:/msys64/home/Wayne/src/kicad-lp-clone/common/debug_report.cpp: In
member function 'void
Hi Reece,
Just a few comments on top of Jeff's reply since this will be your first
patch submission:
Please follow the coding style policy[1]. It saves a lot of back and
forth. There is also a git commit hook[2] which you can use to verify
your coding style is correct. You will have to have
I just saw Jon’s fix for segfault-when-unfolding-bus. Not sure if it was on
master or eemodern, but I added it to eemodern anyway.
> On 2 May 2019, at 08:50, Jeff Young wrote:
>
> For the time being, please send me patches for fixes in the eemodern branch.
>
> I think we’re close enough to
For the time being, please send me patches for fixes in the eemodern branch.
I think we’re close enough to merging that I’d like to retain the rebase option.
(I did pick up Seth’s fix before force-pushing this morning.)
Cheers,
Jeff.
___
Mailing list:
34 matches
Mail list logo
