This sounds like a reasonable proposal. It would probably simplify both
the code and the file format.
On 8/31/2018 1:08 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> Hi JP-
>
> It feels like there might be room to refactor our rectangular pads in v6
> instead of having rectangle/rounded
Hi JP-
It feels like there might be room to refactor our rectangular pads in v6
instead of having rectangle/rounded rectangle/rounded-chamfered rectangle.
We could unify to just "rect" and have an optional sub-elements (rounded
(param ...)) and (chamfer (param ...)). The corner effects then just
Le 31/08/2018 à 09:08, Rene Pöschl a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> From reading the patch it seems this is for cases where you have exactly
> one corner to chamfer. Which is a nice addition for qfn footprints.
>
Attached a new patch (against current master) that allows chamfer 1 to 4
corners.
Of course
Hi,
From reading the patch it seems this is for cases where you have
exactly one corner to chamfer. Which is a nice addition for qfn footprints.
It would however be a bit more flexible if every corner is toggleable
independently (so one could make pads with 1,2,3 or even 4 corners
JP,
This looks useful but please do not merge this until after 5.1 is
released. I want to keep the file formats stable for the entire 5
series of releases. Once we open the development branch for v6, then we
can start making file format changes.
Thanks,
Wayne
On 8/30/2018 2:33 PM, jp charras
Hi Alls,
Attached a patch (against latest master version) that add a new pad
shape: chamfered round rectangle.
It is now frequently used in footprints.
Although this kind of pad shape can be created by custom pad shapes, a
primitive pad shape has some advantages:
- more easy to edit
- support
6 matches
Mail list logo
