Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-14 Thread Nick Østergaard
I think it would be a better use of your time if you could make the BOM exporter already existing have them auto populated. 2017-05-14 21:39 GMT+02:00 Kristoffer Ödmark : > Well I think these reasons are strange, I think that having a built in way > of exporting the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-14 Thread Botond Kiss
It would be useful to have a csv export solution in the component table, both grouped and ungrouped. Dan On 2017-05-14 22:12, Andrey Kuznetsov wrote: Agree, a csv file option should be available. Would be nice if there were 2 flavors, grouped and ungrouped. That's all a general user might

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-14 Thread Andrey Kuznetsov
Agree, a csv file option should be available. Would be nice if there were 2 flavors, grouped and ungrouped. That's all a general user might want. Asking a general user to deal with python is unreasonable, and it took me a while to figure out how the current plug in system works and even longer

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-14 Thread Kristoffer Ödmark
Well I think these reasons are strange, I think that having a built in way of exporting the BoM from the software is reasonable. Since not everyone are the same. The component table is what a user expects to see when wanting to generate a BOM. I can assure you that no EE or student expects to

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-13 Thread Jean-Paul Louis
Stevn, My position in term of electronic design is 180 degrees from yours. When many engineering hours are spent design a manufacturable board, you do not want some bean counter change the BOM in a whim. So in order to control the proper life of a design, you want the schematic to contain the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-13 Thread Strontium
I agree with this decision as well but for different reasons. The more I get into small scale self manufacturing, the more I am persuaded by the argument that you want to keep as little BoM information in the Kicad schematic fields as reasonably possible. It becomes a maintenance nightmare,

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-12 Thread Oliver Walters
JP, This seems very sensible :) Oliver On 13 May 2017 04:18, "jp charras" wrote: > Le 12/05/2017 à 13:55, Oliver Walters a écrit : > > This feature was IN this branch of code but was vetoed. It was WYSIWYG > BoM with export to: > > > > *SV > > XML > > HTML > > > > Wayne

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-12 Thread jp charras
Le 12/05/2017 à 13:55, Oliver Walters a écrit : > This feature was IN this branch of code but was vetoed. It was WYSIWYG BoM > with export to: > > *SV > XML > HTML > > Wayne mentioned that KiCad used to have such a BOM export tool but I haven't > been using KiCad long > enough to have

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-12 Thread Kristoffer Ödmark
Ofcourse, but then that also has the problem that I dont really know what kind of output I can expect, with this component table I know exaclty what to expect. I can see the output before I export it. For example in the pcbnew bom-exporter I get a field that is called "supplier and ref", but

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-12 Thread Oliver Walters
This feature was IN this branch of code but was vetoed. It was WYSIWYG BoM with export to: *SV XML HTML Wayne mentioned that KiCad used to have such a BOM export tool but I haven't been using KiCad long enough to have experienced it. If there is real need for such a feature then I leave that to

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-12 Thread Nick Østergaard
Did you ever try pcbnew > file > export > BOM? Den 12/05/2017 13.17 skrev "Kristoffer Ödmark" : > Doesnt really matter what delimiter is used. > > It would just feel better if kicad had a default BOM-generation built in. > Then I dont mind if someone prefers the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-12 Thread Kristoffer Ödmark
Doesnt really matter what delimiter is used. It would just feel better if kicad had a default BOM-generation built in. Then I dont mind if someone prefers the alternative scritpting way to go because they can generate html or pdf or pictures or whatever. A simple delimiter based exporter as

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-12 Thread Marco Ciampa
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 10:25:49AM +0200, Kristoffer Ödmark wrote: > Just to generate a .csv or a rahter a .tsv as the default. May I suggest a .?sv where the ? character is a "user defined character" that defaults to ... comma (or tab or what you want) Separated Values list? TIA -- Marco

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-12 Thread Kristoffer Ödmark
Hey! This might be the one of the best new features with kicad in my opninion! It would be more intuitive to have a bom-generator inside this tool as well. A wsiwyg BOM-generator if you will. Just to generate a .csv or a rahter a .tsv as the default. Leaving the current way to plugin-generate

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-08 Thread Oliver Walters
Thanks JP :) On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 8:45 PM, jp charras wrote: > Le 08/05/2017 à 09:19, Oliver Walters a écrit : > > JP, > > > > You are correct, wxID_CANCEL was all that was needed. > > > > #004 is attached > > > > Thanks for the feedback :) > > > > Thanks. > I committed

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-08 Thread jp charras
Le 08/05/2017 à 09:19, Oliver Walters a écrit : > JP, > > You are correct, wxID_CANCEL was all that was needed. > > #004 is attached > > Thanks for the feedback :) > Thanks. I committed your patches. -- Jean-Pierre CHARRAS ___ Mailing list:

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-08 Thread Oliver Walters
JP, You are correct, wxID_CANCEL was all that was needed. #004 is attached Thanks for the feedback :) On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:40 PM, jp charras wrote: > Le 08/05/2017 à 05:29, Oliver Walters a écrit : > > JP, > > > > I was expecting this response :) > > > > I was

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-08 Thread jp charras
Le 08/05/2017 à 05:29, Oliver Walters a écrit : > JP, > > I was expecting this response :) > > I was happy to acquiesce initially on this style change as it was only my > preference over yours, but > reading through the responses of a lot of people on the original thread, I > believe that the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Component table improvements

2017-05-07 Thread jp charras
Le 06/05/2017 à 07:35, Oliver Walters a écrit : > After feedback on the original thread > (https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg29057.html) > > I have made some further improvements to the component table: > > a) Add values from template fields where no value exists > b) Allow users