Re: [Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-13 Thread Jose A. Saumell
Hi Adam, thanks! I've posted on bug tracker with details. Didn't work but version from Dec 13 did. On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:28 AM Adam Wolf wrote: > Hello Jose, > > If you could, please follow the bug on the bug tracker. In case you > didn't, please try this

Re: [Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-12 Thread Adam Wolf
Hello Jose, If you could, please follow the bug on the bug tracker. In case you didn't, please try this build ( http://downloads.kicad-pcb.org/osx/nightly/kicad-r6370.20151212-152723.dmg) and please report if it fixes the issue for you. Thank you. Adam Wolf On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM,

Re: [Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-12 Thread Jose A. Saumell
The Core 2 Duo is the first batch of Intel macs with 64-bit processor. The 'core duo' are 32-bit, if you go back enough to cover Core2duo would be great! at least for me :) Cheers. Jose On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:49 AM Bernhard Stegmaier wrote: > If I remember

Re: [Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-12 Thread Bernhard Stegmaier
If I remember correctly the first Intel Mac’s came with Core Duo. With gcc IMHO —march=nocona was the way to go with those. I don’t know what clang supports and how far back we want to be compatible. Regards, Bernhard > On 11 Dec 2015, at 21:32, Adam Wolf wrote:

Re: [Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-12 Thread Adam Wolf
I'm looking at my notes from when I started the Mac nightlies last February and I have the flags for the way they were compiled before. It'll be a good start at least. On Sat, Dec 12, 2015, 7:07 AM Jose A. Saumell wrote: > The Core 2 Duo is the first batch of Intel macs

Re: [Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-12 Thread Garth Corral
We had a long thread about this back in February. I don’t remember what the outcome was, but it was during the debate about whether to support 10.7, and I thought that a line was drawn at supporting Core Duo and 10.7 in the nightlies. https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg17055.html

Re: [Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-12 Thread Adam Wolf
Yeah. I will redo the cairo/pixman recompile soon, but I really think I set it up the same way as I did in February when I rebuilt them. I hope I'm not hitting a homebrew bug--but everything on that machine is pretty heavily logged so I should have the information I need to fix that bug if that

[Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-11 Thread Jose A. Saumell
Hi, I've updated kicad to stable version 4.0.0 today, but I can't open pcbnew or footprint editor anymore. Did anyone experience this issue? kicad.app, eeschema, gerbview, pl_editor and pcb_calculator open fine. This is the crash report I get, any help appreciated: Jose Process:

Re: [Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-11 Thread Adam Wolf
Yes, this is on the bug tracker. This is probably the same issue as https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1522987. I recompiled pixman and cairo on the build server multiple times from 11/16 to 11/19 for another issue. It fixed that issue, but some people, I'm not sure who/why, have a different

Re: [Kicad-developers] OSX 10.9.5 Crash with 4.0.0

2015-12-11 Thread Adam Wolf
That looks right. Now to figure out what a better "more generic" set of CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS we need... On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Bernhard Stegmaier wrote: > EXC_BAD_INSTRUCTION almost looks like maybe pixman chooses some > CPU-dependant optimisation from the