On 01/02/2014 07:04 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
In my opinion if the class is specifically designed for
UTF8, we could drop the std::string iterator.
It is, but it is for strings, not UTF8 character manipulation. Its best use is
at the
edge of the system in helping with serialization and
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 12:04:36PM -0600, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> It is, but it is for strings, not UTF8 character manipulation. Its best use
> is at the
> edge of the system in helping with serialization and de-serialization to
> disk, clipboard,
> other byte oriented peripherals TBD. Futurer
> In my opinion if the class is specifically designed for
>> UTF8, we could drop the std::string iterator.
It is, but it is for strings, not UTF8 character manipulation. Its best use is
at the
edge of the system in helping with serialization and de-serialization to disk,
clipboard,
other byt
On 01/02/2014 10:42 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> On 01/01/2014 07:58 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>> On 11/21/2013 02:16 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>>>
>>> 1) wx >= 2.9 has these constructors
>>>
>>>
>>> wxString( const char* )
>>> wxString( std::string )
>>>
>>> whereas wx 2.8 does not.
>>>
On 01/01/2014 07:58 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
On 11/21/2013 02:16 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
1) wx >= 2.9 has these constructors
wxString( const char* )
wxString( std::string )
whereas wx 2.8 does not.
Both offer:
wxString( const char*, wxConvUTF8 );
but this cannot be us
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 12:58:15AM -0600, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> > encoding cannot be assumed to be UTF8, even though it often is on linux.
> > You just cannot
> > assume it.
Yep, sadly Latin-1 is not distinguishable from UTF-8, except by
heuristics...
> > In summary, I don't see any easy imm
On 11/21/2013 02:16 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>
> 1) wx >= 2.9 has these constructors
>
>
> wxString( const char* )
> wxString( std::string )
>
> whereas wx 2.8 does not.
>
> Both offer:
>
> wxString( const char*, wxConvUTF8 );
>
> but this cannot be used in a default "type prom
On 11/21/2013 3:16 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>
> 1) wx >= 2.9 has these constructors
>
>
> wxString( const char* )
> wxString( std::string )
>
> whereas wx 2.8 does not.
>
> Both offer:
>
> wxString( const char*, wxConvUTF8 );
>
> but this cannot be used in a default "type promo
1) wx >= 2.9 has these constructors
wxString( const char* )
wxString( std::string )
whereas wx 2.8 does not.
Both offer:
wxString( const char*, wxConvUTF8 );
but this cannot be used in a default "type promotion" situation, this
constructor must be
invoked explicitly.
2) Th
9 matches
Mail list logo
