It was also happy here
https://gitlab.com/kicad/packaging/kicad-fedora-builder/-/jobs/1316881996
tor. 3. jun. 2021 22.38 skrev Steven A. Falco :
> Yes - I had to refresh my token too. By the way, below is a link to the
> copr test build I made (in my private copr) - it passed :-)
>
>
Yes - I had to refresh my token too. By the way, below is a link to the copr
test build I made (in my private copr) - it passed :-)
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stevenfalco/kicad/build/2215757/
Steve
On 6/3/21 4:32 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
Ah,ok, I misread the pipeline
Hopefully it should be running ok in
https://gitlab.com/kicad/packaging/kicad-fedora-builder/-/jobs/1316881996
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 22:32, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> Ah,ok, I misread the pipeline logs..
>
> Error: Login invalid/expired. Please visit
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/api to get
Ah,ok, I misread the pipeline logs..
Error: Login invalid/expired. Please visit
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/api to get or renew your API token.
I gotta update that.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 22:29, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> The build you are looking at happened before I put in the fix. In
The build you are looking at happened before I put in the fix. In other words,
I saw that same build failure (on May 30), and put in the fix a few hours later.
The next doc build should use rubygem-asciidoctor in place of asciidoc, and it
should pass.
Can you kick off a manual build of the
@Steven A. Falco
Did you have a look at building the docs for fedora with the other package?
It appears to still BuildRequires: asciidoc when I look in the spec file in
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/kicad/kicad/build/2215751/
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 22:51, Jon Evans wrote:
> If
Hi,
this topic more relevant for kicad-doc I think.
Am 30.05.21 um 20:34 schrieb Jon Evans:
> You want this one: https://github.com/Mogztter/asciidoctor-web-pdf
>
> On Ubuntu I install it with "sudo npm i -g @asciidoctor/core asciidoctor-pdf"
For Debian (and also for Ubuntu) this isn't
If you use Docker, there is also a container for the docs build based on Debian:
https://gitlab.com/kicad/services/kicad-doc/-/blob/master/utils/docker/Dockerfile.kicad-doc-builder-base
Maybe this is also helpful for setting up a Fedora VM or Docker container
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 3:00 PM
I'll have to spin up a VM to play with that. I'll get back to you... :-)
Steve
On 5/30/21 2:34 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
You want this one: https://github.com/Mogztter/asciidoctor-web-pdf
On Ubuntu I install it with "sudo npm i -g @asciidoctor/core asciidoctor-pdf"
On Sun, May 30, 2021
You want this one: https://github.com/Mogztter/asciidoctor-web-pdf
On Ubuntu I install it with "sudo npm i -g @asciidoctor/core asciidoctor-pdf"
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 2:33 PM Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> I'm able to build the html pages, which is all we need for the nightlies, but
> I am not
I'm able to build the html pages, which is all we need for the nightlies, but I
am not able to build the pdf files. I get an error:
Could NOT find ASCIIDOCTORPDF (missing: ASCIIDOCTORPDF_COMMAND)
It looks like CMakeModules/FindASCIIDOCTORPDF.cmake wants a program called
Thanks Jon.
I'm running a test build now. If it passes, I'll propose a patch for the
README. I'll also push the change to the nightly Fedora builds.
Steve
On 5/30/21 1:51 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
Hi Steve,
As the readme notes, I have not yet updated the docs for Fedora or
Manjaro/Arch
Hi Steve,
As the readme notes, I have not yet updated the docs for Fedora or
Manjaro/Arch as I don't use those distros and am not sure of the right
incantations.
If you can advise what should go into the README I'm happy to update it.
Also, please let me know if you run into any snags building
The Fedora nightly build for doc failed because it wanted asciidoctor, but all
it had was asciidoc.
I believe I just need to change the "buildrequires" from:
BuildRequires: asciidoc
to:
BuildRequires: rubygem-asciidoctor
in the kicad-nightly-doc.spec file.
However, I also noticed that
Thanks Mark! I'll file this away for future reference.
On 11/12/2017 10:07 AM, Mark Roszko wrote:
> FYI, here's how you add icons
>
> https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-website/commit/893c902228c5d0a0d6fdbcdf783878cbbd439f6e
>
> Never did figure out how to make hugo set global asciidoc parameters
FYI, here's how you add icons
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-website/commit/893c902228c5d0a0d6fdbcdf783878cbbd439f6e
Never did figure out how to make hugo set global asciidoc parameters
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Wayne Stambaugh
wrote:
> I was hoping the icon would
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 01:46:07PM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:20:32AM -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> > Maybe one of our resident asciidoc experts can help me out. I used a
> > WARNING admonition in the kicad website symbol library table blog
> > post[1]. I was
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:20:32AM -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Maybe one of our resident asciidoc experts can help me out. I used a
> WARNING admonition in the kicad website symbol library table blog
> post[1]. I was expecting to see the warning icon per the asciidoc
> documentation[2] but I
I was hoping the icon would draw user's attention to the warning to the
obvious backup your files statement but maybe I was being a bit
optimistic. I'm fine with it the way it is. I just wanted to be sure I
didn't do anything wrong.
On 11/10/2017 08:48 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> The source
The source and generated code looks correct. It just seems like we don't
have any definition for the admonitionblock div classes for the icons in
the CSS. I guess this is a matter of taste, on whether one likes icons or
text. I guess icons was not implemented because we didn't use many of these
Maybe one of our resident asciidoc experts can help me out. I used a
WARNING admonition in the kicad website symbol library table blog
post[1]. I was expecting to see the warning icon per the asciidoc
documentation[2] but I only see a "WARNING" string where I expected the
icon. Am I doing
21 matches
Mail list logo