Re: [Kicad-developers] Spice simulation on windows.
I have some additional information that may prove useful: 1) Using relative paths in the spinit file does not work on windows. 2) Placing a spinit file in the path where the ngspice and libngspice binaries reside works with no need to set any environment variables. Option 2 could be used by the installer. The installer itself would have to create the spinit file by substituting the install path for the path of the .cm files. I'm not sure if this would work on osx. Maybe one of our osx devs could test this. If it does, than that would resolve the simulation init issues. I've attached a simple circuit that demonstrates the issue. When the .cm files are not located, the simulation will run with the following warnings and cause the output of the op-amp to be an impossibly high 260V: Error on line 0 : a$poly$e.xu1.eos %vd [ xu1.53 xu1.98 ] %vd ( xu1.3 net-_u1-pad1_ ) a$poly$e.xu1.eos MIF-ERROR - unable to find definition of model a$poly$e.xu1.eos Warning: Model issue on line 0 : .model a$poly$e.xu1.eos spice2poly coef = [ 1.7e-3 1 ] ... Unknown model type spice2poly - ignored Error on line 0 : a$poly$e.xu1.eref1 %vd [ vdd 0 0 0 ] %vd ( xu1.98 0 ) a$poly$e.xu1.eref1 MIF-ERROR - unable to find definition of model a$poly$e.xu1.eref1 Warning: Model issue on line 0 : .model a$poly$e.xu1.eref1 spice2poly coef = [ 0 0.5 0.5 ] ... Unknown model type spice2poly - ignored Error on line 0 : a$poly$e.xu1.eref2 %vd [ net-_u1-pad1_ 0 /out 0 ] %vd ( xu1.97 0 ) a$poly$e.xu1.eref2 MIF-ERROR - unable to find definition of model a$poly$e.xu1.eref2 Warning: Model issue on line 0 : .model a$poly$e.xu1.eref2 spice2poly coef = [ 0 0.5 0.5 ] ... Unknown model type spice2poly - ignored Error on line 0 : a$poly$e.xu1.eo3 %vd [ xu1.98 xu1.30 ] %vd ( vdd xu1.42 ) a$poly$e.xu1.eo3 MIF-ERROR - unable to find definition of model a$poly$e.xu1.eo3 Warning: Model issue on line 0 : .model a$poly$e.xu1.eo3 spice2poly coef = [ 0.7175 0.5 ] ... Unknown model type spice2poly - ignored Error on line 0 : a$poly$e.xu1.eo4 %vd [ xu1.30 xu1.98 ] %vd ( xu1.44 0 ) a$poly$e.xu1.eo4 MIF-ERROR - unable to find definition of model a$poly$e.xu1.eo4 Warning: Model issue on line 0 : .model a$poly$e.xu1.eo4 spice2poly coef = [ 0.7355 0.5 ] ... Unknown model type spice2poly - ignored Reducing trtol to 1 for xspice 'A' devices Doing analysis at TEMP = 27.00 and TNOM = 27.00 Warning: vv3: no DC value, transient time 0 value used Let me know if you have any other questions or comments. Cheers, Wayne On 10/6/2016 10:56 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > Hi Maciej > > In the latest nightlies they are now stored in lib/ngspice/ > > I guess that should equate to a relative path to the executables to > ../lib/ngspice/*.cm, given that the exe's are in the bin folder on the > same level as lib. > > So feel free to submit your fix. Also, are there any demos that make > use of those cm libs such that it can be tested? > > Nick > > 2016-10-05 23:16 GMT+02:00 Maciej Sumiński: >> Hi Nick, >> >> Are the .cm files included in the Windows nightlies installer? If so, >> could you tell me what is the relative path to the directory storing >> them? The easiest way to fix the problem is to send a few commands to >> ngspice before a simulation starts. >> >> Regards, >> Orson >> >> On 10/05/2016 10:23 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: >>> Is this really needed? What exactly does the .cm files provide? >>> >>> When I run the latest nightly I can run the allen key demo without >>> problems as far as I can see. Maybe some other simulation modes do >>> not work properly? >>> >>> 2016-09-30 14:37 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh : That would work as a long term solution as well. I was trying to at least prove that it can be done without make changes to the current code. Until a full solution is implemented, users (me) will have an interim solution if they want to use the spice simulator. Cheers, Wayne On 9/30/2016 3:40 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > We have also discussed on IRC another possibility, which is loading the > extensions manually instead of having ngspice process its initialization > file (spinit). This way we can adjust the paths during runtime. > > Regards, > Orson > > On 09/29/2016 08:51 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> After much cursing and many config attempts, I finally have a working >> spice simulation solution on windows. I'm guessing similar parallels >> can be applied to osx as well. >> >> >> Option A: running from a mingw32 or mingw64 terminal. >> >> 1) copy the installed spinit file (by default will be in >> ${MINGW-PACKAGE-PREFIX}/share/ngspice/scripts) to ~/.spiceinit. >> 2) change the msys2 paths (/mingw##) in ~/.spiceinit to absolute windows >> paths with / not \ (in my case C:/msys64/mingw##). >> 3) Launch kicad.exe from the terminal. >> >> I realize this is not very
Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad promotion in help menu
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:34:34PM +1100, Cirilo Bernardo wrote: > I think the main reason the patch is that size is that I had to touch > quite a few files to add the help item to the many different Help menus > (eeschema, schematic symbol editor, footprint editor, pcbnew, etc). I think > the About dialog is so full of information now that people will miss the > link if we put it there. Adding the actual menu item in each different > Help menu and the wxWidgets code to run the browser are actually > only a very few lines. I suggested adding an item to the About dialog at > one stage but many of our current contributors told me that they thought > it wasn't the best thing to do. Sorry for being so "naive", you see I am not a dev... but I am wondering if it could spare some code using an unique "about" or help dialog and dialog code across all KiCad apps... -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. GNU/Linux User #78271 FSFE fellow #364 ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] -Wsuggest-override with scripting enabled
On 10/6/2016 8:42 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 06/10/2016 à 14:30, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : >> On 10/6/2016 2:58 AM, John Beard wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:10 AM, jp charraswrote: It works for me, but I had to modify the patch the change in pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt is if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override ) instead of if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override ) >> >> @JP, I will go ahead and commit John's patch as is. If you want me to, >> I can add your changes as a separate commit or you can commit the >> changes. Please let me know. > > If my changes are also working for you, add them. > Thanks. That fixed it so I committed the change. Thanks. > >> >>> >>> That's seems strange that adding the file to that list would just >>> work. Since CMake doesn't know about that file (it's not declared as >>> an output or a compiled file anywhere), how does it ever get compiled >>> in the first place, let alone get special flags applied to it? Are you >>> sure the file is being rebuilt the second time? >> >> I was wondering about that myself. I grepped pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt and >> there is no pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx so I'm not sure where this is getting >> pulled in unless it's something swig is generating. > > I did not found it in CMakeLists.txt. > However it is in a .make autogenerated file. > > Unfortunately I have a very limited knowledge of cmake an swig, and I don't > know exactly what tool > has generated the commands (in build.make) to build/compile > pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx. > > >> >>> >>> I may have missed the warnings from the pcbnewPYTHON file, as they did >>> overrun my terminal scrollback, but on cleaning and rebuilding, I >>> don't actually see that file being created or compiled at all. I do >>> see pcbnew_wrap.cpp being created and compiled as expected. When do >>> others see that file appear in the build tree (I assume at the same >>> time as pcbnew_wrap.cxx?) and when does pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx appear >>> in the compilation output (approximately, exact result depend on >>> CMake's multithreading)? >>> >>> GCC 6.2.1 is the compiler, CMake 3.6.2, SWIG 3.0.10, on Arch Linux. > > ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] -Wsuggest-override with scripting enabled
Patches committed. Thanks. On 10/5/2016 10:05 AM, John Beard wrote: > Hi, > > Rather than blanket-disabling -Wsuggest-override when scripting is > enabled, it's possible to turn the warnings off for just the > problematic pcbnew_wrap.cxx file using set_source_file_properties(). > > This means when building with scripting (which I always do), the > warnings are still enabled for all other files. > > Second patch is an override opportunity which was previously silenced > by the blanket disabling of the warning. > > Thanks, > > John > > > > ___ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad promotion in help menu
On 10/6/2016 3:23 AM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 08:51:54AM +0200, jp charras wrote: >> Le 06/10/2016 à 08:13, Cirilo Bernardo a écrit : >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Any comments on this patch I proposed a few weeks ago? >>> >>> https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg26412.html >>> >>> The patch adds a menu item in the main menu Help list to launch the >>> system's default browser and bring up the "Contribute to KiCad" page >>> (http://kicad-pcb.org/contribute/). The idea is to promote awareness >>> of how users can get involved, whether it's helping with documentation, >>> libraries, etc. I think we have a great little group at the moment, but >>> more experts helping out or new users learning about the internals of >>> the software is always better. :) >>> >>> >>> - Cirilo >> @Cirilo, I didn't forget about it I've just been really busy. I will try to get to it this weekend. >> To be honest, if I like the idea, I am not thrilled by this (large?) patch. >> A link in our About Kicad dialog (Information panel) could be better (only 2 >> lines of code to add). >> On this Information panel (the default panel when opening the dialog) there >> are already the most >> important links. > > As we discussed with Wayne on IRC a while ago, nobody will ever see it > there. AFAIR I suggested adding this link to the about dialog as well but I don't really have a strong opinion one way or the other. Cirilo is correct that it could get lost along with all of the other information in the about dialog. > >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS >> >> ___ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > ___ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] -Wsuggest-override with scripting enabled
Le 06/10/2016 à 14:30, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : > On 10/6/2016 2:58 AM, John Beard wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:10 AM, jp charraswrote: >>> >>> It works for me, but I had to modify the patch >>> the change in pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt is >>> if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) >>> set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx >>> PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override >>> ) >>> >>> instead of >>> if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) >>> set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx >>> PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override >>> ) > > @JP, I will go ahead and commit John's patch as is. If you want me to, > I can add your changes as a separate commit or you can commit the > changes. Please let me know. If my changes are also working for you, add them. Thanks. > >> >> That's seems strange that adding the file to that list would just >> work. Since CMake doesn't know about that file (it's not declared as >> an output or a compiled file anywhere), how does it ever get compiled >> in the first place, let alone get special flags applied to it? Are you >> sure the file is being rebuilt the second time? > > I was wondering about that myself. I grepped pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt and > there is no pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx so I'm not sure where this is getting > pulled in unless it's something swig is generating. I did not found it in CMakeLists.txt. However it is in a .make autogenerated file. Unfortunately I have a very limited knowledge of cmake an swig, and I don't know exactly what tool has generated the commands (in build.make) to build/compile pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx. > >> >> I may have missed the warnings from the pcbnewPYTHON file, as they did >> overrun my terminal scrollback, but on cleaning and rebuilding, I >> don't actually see that file being created or compiled at all. I do >> see pcbnew_wrap.cpp being created and compiled as expected. When do >> others see that file appear in the build tree (I assume at the same >> time as pcbnew_wrap.cxx?) and when does pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx appear >> in the compilation output (approximately, exact result depend on >> CMake's multithreading)? >> >> GCC 6.2.1 is the compiler, CMake 3.6.2, SWIG 3.0.10, on Arch Linux. -- Jean-Pierre CHARRAS ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] -Wsuggest-override with scripting enabled
On 10/6/2016 2:58 AM, John Beard wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:10 AM, jp charraswrote: >> >> It works for me, but I had to modify the patch >> the change in pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt is >> if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) >> set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx >> PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override >> ) >> >> instead of >> if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) >> set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx >> PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override >> ) @JP, I will go ahead and commit John's patch as is. If you want me to, I can add your changes as a separate commit or you can commit the changes. Please let me know. > > That's seems strange that adding the file to that list would just > work. Since CMake doesn't know about that file (it's not declared as > an output or a compiled file anywhere), how does it ever get compiled > in the first place, let alone get special flags applied to it? Are you > sure the file is being rebuilt the second time? I was wondering about that myself. I grepped pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt and there is no pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx so I'm not sure where this is getting pulled in unless it's something swig is generating. > > I may have missed the warnings from the pcbnewPYTHON file, as they did > overrun my terminal scrollback, but on cleaning and rebuilding, I > don't actually see that file being created or compiled at all. I do > see pcbnew_wrap.cpp being created and compiled as expected. When do > others see that file appear in the build tree (I assume at the same > time as pcbnew_wrap.cxx?) and when does pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx appear > in the compilation output (approximately, exact result depend on > CMake's multithreading)? > > GCC 6.2.1 is the compiler, CMake 3.6.2, SWIG 3.0.10, on Arch Linux. > > ___ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] PATCH: To facilitate easier Via Curtain/Filling
Sorry for Gravedigging. Maybe some heretic (and mostlikely stupid) questions but: why is there even an automatic relabeling implement? Would not it be much more convenient to have it as seperate tool instead of a mandatory step (like the cleaning up)? Further more it seems like /RecalculateAllTracksNetcode /recognize the legacy version of zones (SEGZONE) correctly as SEGZONE is a TRACK while the newer ZONE_CONTAINER is "only" a BOARD_CONNECTED_ITEM . If one stick to the automatic relabeling: Would not it be a bit more logical to consider all BOARD_CONNECTED_ITEM instead of only TRACKS? ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] -Wsuggest-override with scripting enabled
Le 06/10/2016 à 08:58, John Beard a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:10 AM, jp charraswrote: >> >> It works for me, but I had to modify the patch >> the change in pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt is >> if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) >> set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx >> PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override >> ) >> >> instead of >> if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) >> set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx >> PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override >> ) > > That's seems strange that adding the file to that list would just > work. Since CMake doesn't know about that file (it's not declared as > an output or a compiled file anywhere), how does it ever get compiled > in the first place, let alone get special flags applied to it? Are you > sure the file is being rebuilt the second time? I am sure *both* pcbnew_wrap.cxx and pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx were recompiled and must be in set_source_files_properties list to avoid warnings. In my install (W7, 32 bits, msys2), the file: /Build/Release/pcbnew/CMakeFiles/_pcbnew.dir/build.make (Generated by "MSYS Makefiles" Generator, CMake Version 3.4) contains the commands to compile pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx > > I may have missed the warnings from the pcbnewPYTHON file, as they did > overrun my terminal scrollback, but on cleaning and rebuilding, I > don't actually see that file being created or compiled at all. I do > see pcbnew_wrap.cpp being created and compiled as expected. When do > others see that file appear in the build tree (I assume at the same > time as pcbnew_wrap.cxx?) and when does pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx appear > in the compilation output (approximately, exact result depend on > CMake's multithreading)? > > GCC 6.2.1 is the compiler, CMake 3.6.2, SWIG 3.0.10, on Arch Linux. -- Jean-Pierre CHARRAS ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad promotion in help menu
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:51 PM, jp charraswrote: > Le 06/10/2016 à 08:13, Cirilo Bernardo a écrit : >> Hi folks, >> >> Any comments on this patch I proposed a few weeks ago? >> >> https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg26412.html >> >> The patch adds a menu item in the main menu Help list to launch the >> system's default browser and bring up the "Contribute to KiCad" page >> (http://kicad-pcb.org/contribute/). The idea is to promote awareness >> of how users can get involved, whether it's helping with documentation, >> libraries, etc. I think we have a great little group at the moment, but >> more experts helping out or new users learning about the internals of >> the software is always better. :) >> >> >> - Cirilo > > To be honest, if I like the idea, I am not thrilled by this (large?) patch. > A link in our About Kicad dialog (Information panel) could be better (only 2 > lines of code to add). > On this Information panel (the default panel when opening the dialog) there > are already the most > important links. > > > -- > Jean-Pierre CHARRAS > I think the main reason the patch is that size is that I had to touch quite a few files to add the help item to the many different Help menus (eeschema, schematic symbol editor, footprint editor, pcbnew, etc). I think the About dialog is so full of information now that people will miss the link if we put it there. Adding the actual menu item in each different Help menu and the wxWidgets code to run the browser are actually only a very few lines. I suggested adding an item to the About dialog at one stage but many of our current contributors told me that they thought it wasn't the best thing to do. - Cirilo > ___ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] -Wsuggest-override with scripting enabled
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:10 AM, jp charraswrote: > > It works for me, but I had to modify the patch > the change in pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt is > if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) > set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx > PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override > ) > > instead of > if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) > set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx > PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override > ) That's seems strange that adding the file to that list would just work. Since CMake doesn't know about that file (it's not declared as an output or a compiled file anywhere), how does it ever get compiled in the first place, let alone get special flags applied to it? Are you sure the file is being rebuilt the second time? I may have missed the warnings from the pcbnewPYTHON file, as they did overrun my terminal scrollback, but on cleaning and rebuilding, I don't actually see that file being created or compiled at all. I do see pcbnew_wrap.cpp being created and compiled as expected. When do others see that file appear in the build tree (I assume at the same time as pcbnew_wrap.cxx?) and when does pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx appear in the compilation output (approximately, exact result depend on CMake's multithreading)? GCC 6.2.1 is the compiler, CMake 3.6.2, SWIG 3.0.10, on Arch Linux. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad promotion in help menu
Le 06/10/2016 à 08:13, Cirilo Bernardo a écrit : > Hi folks, > > Any comments on this patch I proposed a few weeks ago? > > https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg26412.html > > The patch adds a menu item in the main menu Help list to launch the > system's default browser and bring up the "Contribute to KiCad" page > (http://kicad-pcb.org/contribute/). The idea is to promote awareness > of how users can get involved, whether it's helping with documentation, > libraries, etc. I think we have a great little group at the moment, but > more experts helping out or new users learning about the internals of > the software is always better. :) > > > - Cirilo To be honest, if I like the idea, I am not thrilled by this (large?) patch. A link in our About Kicad dialog (Information panel) could be better (only 2 lines of code to add). On this Information panel (the default panel when opening the dialog) there are already the most important links. -- Jean-Pierre CHARRAS ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad promotion in help menu
On 06.10.2016 08:13, Cirilo Bernardo wrote: > Hi folks, > > Any comments on this patch I proposed a few weeks ago? > > https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg26412.html > > The patch adds a menu item in the main menu Help list to launch the > system's default browser and bring up the "Contribute to KiCad" page I'm in for it! ;-) Tom ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] kicad promotion in help menu
Hi folks, Any comments on this patch I proposed a few weeks ago? https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg26412.html The patch adds a menu item in the main menu Help list to launch the system's default browser and bring up the "Contribute to KiCad" page (http://kicad-pcb.org/contribute/). The idea is to promote awareness of how users can get involved, whether it's helping with documentation, libraries, etc. I think we have a great little group at the moment, but more experts helping out or new users learning about the internals of the software is always better. :) - Cirilo ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Kicad-developers] -Wsuggest-override with scripting enabled
Le 06/10/2016 à 01:07, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : > On 10/5/2016 5:42 PM, José Ignacio wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Wayne Stambaughwrote: >>> pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx >> >> That file is a source of pain, it appears to be generated by swig as a >> side effect and it does go stale sometimes (whenever there is a >> breaking change in the python api) as cmake is not keeping track of it >> (the only solution is to delete that file and rebuild, or do a clean >> build). I tried adding it as the list of generated files in the >> cmakelists but had no effect. >> > > I did an clean config and build but still have this issue. If you > delete pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx, it will automatically get regenerated so > you solution doesn't work. I'm not sure what to do about this. > It works for me, but I had to modify the patch the change in pcbnew/CMakeLists.txt is if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override ) instead of if( COMPILER_SUPPORTS_WSUGGEST_OVERRIDE ) set_source_files_properties(pcbnew_wrap.cxx PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS -Wno-suggest-override ) (In the initial patch pcbnewPYTHON_wrap.cxx is missing in set_source_files_properties file list) -- Jean-Pierre CHARRAS ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp