Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Hi, Am 21.10.19 um 23:16 schrieb Ian McInerney: > We also seem to have assertions enabled in the Debian build (there have > been two reports from users [1], [2]). Is this something we control as > well, or is the the distribution packaging forcing them on? the Debian build configuration is

Re: [Kicad-developers] Issues building PCBNew on Windows10/Msys:fatal exception

2019-10-21 Thread Brian Piccioni
Wayne Thanks for the additional information. I mentioned the compile warnings because they appear to be different from the ones I got when I compiled 32 bit. As for MSVC, I am a big fan and can see the benefits of moving to it. One advantage was that you wouldn’t have to install MSYS2 and all

Re: [Kicad-developers] Minimum Boost version

2019-10-21 Thread Jon Evans
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 5:53 PM Diego Herranz wrote: > > It looks like by the time 6.0 is out, Ubuntu 16.04 may still be officially > supported. Just something to have in mind. > I love your optimism :) ___ Mailing list:

Re: [Kicad-developers] Minimum Boost version

2019-10-21 Thread Diego Herranz
I understand and that'll mean I'll have to move on, which in my case, it's not a big issue. I was waiting until 20.04 LTS, though :) >> The stable version of KiCad will always build with 16.04. It looks like by the time 6.0 is out, Ubuntu 16.04 may still be officially supported. Just something

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Ian McInerney
We also seem to have assertions enabled in the Debian build (there have been two reports from users [1], [2]). Is this something we control as well, or is the the distribution packaging forcing them on? -Ian [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1847554 [2]

Re: [Kicad-developers] Minimum Boost version

2019-10-21 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
According to Ubuntu[1], 16.04 looks like it will continue to receive maintenance updates until April 2021. It looks like we got that wrong. The boost version in 16.04 is 1.58. There is no newer version of boost in the back ports repo so we have a decision to make. Drop support for Ubuntu 16.04

Re: [Kicad-developers] Minimum Boost version

2019-10-21 Thread Nick Østergaard
You can still run 5.1 on 16.04. If you want bleeding edge, don't lock yourself down with a "stable" system. On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 21:37, Diego Herranz wrote: > > I see. Are those dates when the respective OS support finishes or when we > stop supporting them? > I was under the impression it is

Re: [Kicad-developers] Minimum Boost version

2019-10-21 Thread Diego Herranz
I see. Are those dates when the respective OS support finishes or when we stop supporting them? I was under the impression it is the former (although it is not fully clear) in which case that date is wrong. Thanks, Diego On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 20:16, Ian McInerney wrote: > The listing I used

Re: [Kicad-developers] Minimum Boost version

2019-10-21 Thread Ian McInerney
The listing I used when looking at whether our supported OS's had Boost 1.59 were the dates given here: http://kicad-pcb.org/help/system-requirements/#_gnulinux. On that page, it says that our support for 16.04 ended in April. -Ian On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:03 PM Diego Herranz wrote: > I

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Ian McInerney
There were two bugs still on the 5.1.5 milestone [1], [2] that related to the editing of H/V/45 constrained polygons. I have bumped those to 6.0 now. Should we reopen and move [3] and [4] to 6.0 so that we actually fix the issues there? -Ian [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1842055 [2]

Re: [Kicad-developers] Minimum Boost version

2019-10-21 Thread Diego Herranz
I wasn't getting any nightly package update lately and checking [1] I've just noticed this boost bump has left Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial) out. Ubuntu 16.04 will be supported until April 2021 [2]. Was this overlooked when checking distros? Or was it a deliberate decision? Is there anything that can be

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Seth Hillbrand
On 2019-10-21 10:52, Ian McInerney wrote: Seth, Just to clarify, for 5.1.5 (and future 5.1 releases), the H/V/45 is only available during initial zone creation and is not going to be active for editing the lines after creation? If this is the case, I will push the bugs for this into the 6.0

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
I thought this might be the case. If you click cancel, the assertion dialog will not be displayed again until you restart KiCad. Would one of our macos devs please take a look at the config settings use to build wxWidgets and see if we can turn the assertions off on release builds? This might

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Ian McInerney
Seth, Just to clarify, for 5.1.5 (and future 5.1 releases), the H/V/45 is only available during initial zone creation and is not going to be active for editing the lines after creation? If this is the case, I will push the bugs for this into the 6.0 milestone, so they can be addressed there.

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Adam Wolf
It may be a false alarm--I am reviewing everything and it looks like it is working for everyone so far. There may be some documentation we have to add to the macOS specific things about allowing permissions when a popup pops up on first run, but if I am understanding correctly none of the issues

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Hi Jonaton, This is an assertion in wxWidgets being raised. This really shouldn't happen on release builds. While assertions like this are annoying they are not show stoppers unless clicking either the "No" or "Cancel" buttons cause KiCad to crash. I'm guessing this is not the case but one of

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 10/20/19 12:02 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote: > On 2019-10-20 08:40, Ian McInerney wrote: > >> There is also this H/V/45 issue [1]. It is more of a gray area though, >> since it will probably involve touching the file format due to what is >> happening (the H/V/45 is being saved as a global board

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Do we know if this is a KiCad source bug issue or a macos packaging issue? I was getting the distinct impression that it was the latter. I agree that we do not want to release 5.1.5 without a functioning macos package. I'm willing to hold off on the rc1 tag until we resolve this issue. It may

Re: [Kicad-developers] 5.1.5 release status

2019-10-21 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Hi Seth, On 10/20/19 1:48 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote: > Hi Wayne- > > These should be fixed.  I've pushed the reload issue off to v6 as the > setting isn't available in the current file format as Ian mentioned, so > I've reset the associated bug with a new milestone. Thanks. I appreciate the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Issues building PCBNew on Windows 10/Msys:fatal exception

2019-10-21 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Brian, On 10/21/19 9:24 AM, Brian Piccioni wrote: > I'm updating this email in case somebody else has a similar problem. > >   > > I reinstalled Msys2 64 bit and rebuilt a 64 bit debug version of Kicad. > It appear to run fine, except when I run PCBNew from a mingw64 terminal > I get > >   >

Re: [Kicad-developers] Issues building PCBNew on Windows 10/Msys:fatal exception

2019-10-21 Thread Brian Piccioni
I'm updating this email in case somebody else has a similar problem. I reinstalled Msys2 64 bit and rebuilt a 64 bit debug version of Kicad. It appear to run fine, except when I run PCBNew from a mingw64 terminal I get $ pcbnew