On my side (ppa Ubuntu) I see an impact on the nightly builds package since
I produce renamed desktop files. I'll check that point as soon as possible.
Le mer. 20 janv. 2021 à 18:35, Seth Hillbrand a écrit :
> This is a heads up for our Linux packagers that the launcher locations
> have changed
Hi Jeff, Did you use github.com github.com or that one for Java github.com
github.com ? Mockitopp has its last code update about ~1,5 year ago, so
it looks it has the same downside as HippoMocks. There is also Mockpp, also
not actively developed: sourceforge.net sourceforge.net BR,
You are correct, Nick. No changes are needed. The "make install" step copies
the files from linux/launchers into share/applications and the spec file picks them up
from there.
Steve
On 1/20/21 3:22 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
The kicad.spec file for Fedora runs desktop-file-install
The kicad.spec file for Fedora runs desktop-file-install on the desktop files.
It will likely have to change. I'm running a test build now. Here is the
relevant code from the spec file:
# Desktop integration
for desktopfile in %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop ; do
Mmm, I guess they are also part of the install target in cmake and no real
packaging changes are needed a such, right?
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 18:34, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> This is a heads up for our Linux packagers that the launcher locations
> have changed in the master branch.
>
> You will
This is a heads up for our Linux packagers that the launcher locations have
changed in the master branch.
You will now find the .desktop launcher files in the build directory, under
`resources/linux/launchers/`
-Seth
--
[image: KiCad Services Corporation Logo]
Seth Hillbrand
*Lead Developer*
6 matches
Mail list logo
