I have updated it now.
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 16:41, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:35 PM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
>>
>> Considering that there are also changes to the library in the releases, does
>> it make sense to package the light releases for the versioned
>>
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:35 PM Ian McInerney
wrote:
> Considering that there are also changes to the library in the releases,
> does it make sense to package the light releases for the versioned
> (non-testing/nightly) releases. I would think that in this case users would
> want the updated
I see you got the macOS package uploaded to the server so I will take a
stab at updating the website later today before I make the release
announcement.
Wayne
On 5/15/20 10:11 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> Unfortunately I won't be able to prep the macOS page today, (sorry
> for forgetting that) but I
Unfortunately I won't be able to prep the macOS page today, (sorry
for forgetting that) but I hope someone else can get to it before the
blog post goes live. Thanks, folks!
Adam
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:02 AM Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> On 5/15/20 9:55 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> > On
On 5/15/20 9:55 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 5/15/20 8:54 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> I just took a look at the website download page and noticed everything
>> is still 5.1.5. Does someone have a website update for 5.1.6 queued up
>> or do I need to update it? I know the release
On 5/15/20 8:54 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
I just took a look at the website download page and noticed everything
is still 5.1.5. Does someone have a website update for 5.1.6 queued up
or do I need to update it? I know the release announcement is ready.
Fedora Rawhide is listed as having
I just took a look at the website download page and noticed everything
is still 5.1.5. Does someone have a website update for 5.1.6 queued up
or do I need to update it? I know the release announcement is ready.
On 5/15/20 5:58 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote:
> KiCad 5.1.6 is now available on
Ah, found it in testing.
Just tested 64bit build, it does indeed download 5.1.6 tagged archive from
github.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:55 AM Nick Østergaard wrote:
> They are under testing for a reason. That is they have not been tested
> yet. I expect them to download the tagged version, but I
They are under testing for a reason. That is they have not been tested
yet. I expect them to download the tagged version, but I have not
verified it yet.
On Fri, 15 May 2020 at 13:47, Andrew Lutsenko wrote:
>
> They can get libraries using lite release as well, it's just install time
>
They can get libraries using lite release as well, it's just install time
download.
But probably many like me never install libraries anyway (I have official
libs in separate git checkout).
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:35 AM Ian McInerney
wrote:
> Considering that there are also changes to the
Considering that there are also changes to the library in the releases,
does it make sense to package the light releases for the versioned
(non-testing/nightly) releases. I would think that in this case users would
want the updated libraries.
-Ian
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33 PM Andrew Lutsenko
Windows 5.1.6 builds seem to be uploaded as well but no lite release?
https://kicad-downloads.s3.cern.ch/index.html?prefix=windows/stable/
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:59 AM Jean-Samuel Reynaud
wrote:
> KiCad 5.1.6 is now available on Ubuntu PPA since 2 days.
>
> And some statistics on May 2020:
>
KiCad 5.1.6 is now available on Ubuntu PPA since 2 days.
And some statistics on May 2020:
By Ubuntu version (only for 5.1 download):
Focal (20.04) 499.00 ( 8%)
Eoan (19.10) 389.00 ( 6%)
Bionic (18.04)4753.00 (76%)
Xenial (16.04) 582.00 ( 9%)
Totals6223.00
Le
Mac builds have been uploaded, just the same as all the other 5.1
releases. Have a good weekend, everyone!
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:48 PM Kevin Cozens wrote:
>
> On 2020-05-13 4:11 p.m., Rene Pöschl wrote:
> > You must pull the tagged commit otherwise you get whatever got merged last.
>
> Ok,
On 2020-05-13 4:11 p.m., Rene Pöschl wrote:
You must pull the tagged commit otherwise you get whatever got merged last.
Ok, thank you. With the v6 libraries no longer compatible with v5 I was
expecting to see a branch, not just a tag. Does this mean the v5 libraries
are no longer being
On 13/05/2020 19:18, Kevin Cozens wrote:
On 2020-05-12 10:36 a.m., Nick Østergaard wrote:
The library is till on github:
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-templates
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-packages3D
The code,
On 2020-05-12 10:36 a.m., Nick Østergaard wrote:
The library is till on github:
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-templates
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-packages3D
The code, translation and docs are on gitlab:
5.1.6 is available in Fedora Rawhide now.
5.1.6 will become available in Fedora 31 and Fedora 32 after 7 days (or sooner
if three people up-vote it).
Steve
On 5/12/20 5:32 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
Awesome, thanks for the update. I better trigger the windows build as well.
On Tue,
Awesome, thanks for the update. I better trigger the windows build as well.
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 23:30, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> Thanks Nick. I've started the builds on Fedora Koji. The rawhide build is
> done, and will become available on the next successful rawhide compose.
>
> The F32
Thanks Nick. I've started the builds on Fedora Koji. The rawhide build is
done, and will become available on the next successful rawhide compose.
The F32 build finished but I want to test it before I submit it. The F31 build
is still finishing up, but should be ready for me to test soon.
The library is till on github:
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-templates
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-packages3D
The code, translation and docs are on gitlab:
https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/kicad
I'd like to clarify which pieces come from where. The old list was:
https://launchpad.net/kicad/5.0
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-doc
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-i18n
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-templates
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-footprints
Thanks Rene. I just tagged 5.1.6 in the repo so once the doc and
translations are tagged we should be ready to fire up the package builders.
On 5/11/20 3:15 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> library is tagged. Some bugfixes on the symbol lib again result in
> changes that would break an existing
Hi,
library is tagged. Some bugfixes on the symbol lib again result in
changes that would break an existing schematic.
See details in issue comment:
https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-symbols/issues/2656#issuecomment-626880880
On 10/05/2020 18:07, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
Since we are only a week
The stable packages might not have been touched since we made this switch
after releasing 5.1.5 (at least the Fedora package still has launchpad in
it). But I don't think that is a good reason to still use it, the scripts
should be updated with this release.
-Ian
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:00 PM
It would make my life easier so I am all for that. I don't know if any
of our package build scripts still pull from launchpad. That's why I asked.
On 5/11/20 2:55 PM, Ian McInerney wrote:
> I would suggest we switch to GitLab as the single source of truth for
> the code tarballs for this
I would suggest we switch to GitLab as the single source of truth for the
code tarballs for this release.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 7:25 PM Wayne Stambaugh
wrote:
> Is there any reason that I need to continue uploading stable source
> archives to launchpad now that you can do this directly from
Is there any reason that I need to continue uploading stable source
archives to launchpad now that you can do this directly from gitlab?
On 5/10/20 12:07 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Since we are only a week away (Friday) from the proposed 5.1.6 release
> date and none of the critical bugs seem
Since we are only a week away (Friday) from the proposed 5.1.6 release
date and none of the critical bugs seem to be reproducible, I would
like to tag the 5.1 branch tomorrow along with the other repos so we
have time to allow the package builders to complete and website download
page to be
29 matches
Mail list logo
