Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Add/modify python APIs for querying available pcbnew footprints

bump I've updated my patch to be much better/cleaner. Attached patch is the same as in my previous, confusing perhaps, mail. :-) Miles On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:33 PM, miles mccoo wrote: > resend, this time to the list and not just to Wayne. Keep forgetting that > the

Re: [Kicad-developers] _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS?

Hey Adam, According to the latest cmake (3.11) docs[1], CheckCXXSymbolExists.cmake still contains a CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS command. This has been around for a really long time, I'm not sure why you would be having issues with this now unless you have a broken cmake install. Wayne On 3/30/2018

Re: [Kicad-developers] What is the purpose of multiple 3D models?

Yikes. That’s probably beyond a couple of help strings in the UI. Perhaps I’ll just de-emphasize the multiple-models part of it for users who don’t need this. Thanks for the explanation. Cheers, Jeff. > On 30 Mar 2018, at 23:13, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > Den lør. 31.

Re: [Kicad-developers] What is the purpose of multiple 3D models?

Den lør. 31. mar. 2018 00.02 skrev Jeff Young : > A footprint can have several 3D models associated with it (confusingly > named 3D Shape Names in the dialog, but never mind that). > > What is the purpose of this? > > Is it so that library devs can add different formats and the

[Kicad-developers] _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS?

Hi folks! Normally I wouldn't ask this question on the list, but it's at or past crunch time on the new macOS packaging, so please forgive me. I have a macOS 10.11 system I use for KiCad packaging sometimes, and I'm running some tests on it. It has cmake 3.11.0 on it. 8 days ago, I was able to

Re: [Kicad-developers] _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS?

I'm using 3.10 so that's why I haven't seen this yet. I guess we are going to have to fix this. It's would be nice if the cmake folks would have at least provided a substitution and a warning rather than break everybody's configuration who uses CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS. On 3/30/2018 5:15 PM, Seth

Re: [Kicad-developers] _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS?

Yeah, I wholeheartedly agree. The file hasn't been touched in years, but the issue persisted after a clean. Good thing I can abandon this machine soon :) I'll keep an eye on it, but if it doesn't happen again, /shrug. Adam On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Wayne Stambaugh

[Kicad-developers] What is the purpose of multiple 3D models?

A footprint can have several 3D models associated with it (confusingly named 3D Shape Names in the dialog, but never mind that). What is the purpose of this? Is it so that library devs can add different formats and the renderer will choose the first it has a plugin for? If so, we need to say

Re: [Kicad-developers] _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS?

Hi Adam- You will need to downgrade to CMake 3.10 or lower. In 3.11, they revised the internals of CheckSymbolExists. Our macro depends on the internal CMake macro _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS (note the underscore at the beginning). In 3.11, they replaced it with __CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS_IMPL. -S

Re: [Kicad-developers] _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS?

do they really need to if its an “internal” cmake macro > On 31/03/2018, at 10:24 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > I'm using 3.10 so that's why I haven't seen this yet. I guess we are > going to have to fix this. It's would be nice if the cmake folks would > have at least

Re: [Kicad-developers] _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS?

We use this in CheckCXXSymbolExists and Cmake has provided this function since 2.8.6. I've removed the repository copy of this macro to allow Cmake to use its own. This should be safe as we have already set a minimum Cmake version of 2.8.12. Let me know if you still have this issue, Adam. -S

[Kicad-developers] Fwd: _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS?

Sending via the correct email address... -- Forwarded message -- From: Adam Wolf Date: Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:59 PM Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] _CHECK_SYMBOL_EXISTS? To: Seth Hillbrand Cc: Wayne Stambaugh

Re: [Kicad-developers] Partial fix for bug #1758747 Import Eagle Project ignores cream="no" option

Hi Russell- Will you have time to update this patch? If not, I'm happy to revise it to handle the cases this weekend. We're getting close to rc2 and I'd like to get your fix in before it is released. Best- Seth 2018-03-27 13:12 GMT-07:00 Seth Hillbrand : > Hi