Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

On 4/3/2018 7:33 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 03/04/2018 à 13:25, Maciej Sumiński a écrit : >> On 04/03/2018 01:20 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: >>> On 03/04/18 13:17, Nick Østergaard wrote: I think we should not disable the github plugin, but we may need to remove it from the wizard in a

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

On 03.04.2018 01:42, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: Are there any other outstanding issues we need to fix before rc2 is tagged? https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1678849 Today is one year since bug reported: opening eeschema in standalone mode ignores page layout description file setting.

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

On 04/03/2018 01:20 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > On 03/04/18 13:17, Nick Østergaard wrote: >> I think we should not disable the github plugin, but we may need to >> remove it from the wizard in a way that does not emphasize that this is >> the way to go. Maybe it is ok to remove it completely

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

Le 03/04/2018 à 00:42, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : > Things have quieted down quit a bit so we should be close to an rc2 > release. I saw a 3D viewer crash report but it looks like it might be a > video driver issue. Are there any other outstanding issues we need to > fix before rc2 is tagged?

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

2018-04-03 13:12 GMT+02:00 jp charras : > Le 03/04/2018 à 00:42, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : > > Things have quieted down quit a bit so we should be close to an rc2 > > release. I saw a 3D viewer crash report but it looks like it might be a > > video driver issue. Are there

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

On 03/04/18 13:17, Nick Østergaard wrote: > I think we should not disable the github plugin, but we may need to > remove it from the wizard in a way that does not emphasize that this is > the way to go. Maybe it is ok to remove it completely from the wizard, > but just let the plugin in the

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

Le 03/04/2018 à 13:25, Maciej Sumiński a écrit : > On 04/03/2018 01:20 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: >> On 03/04/18 13:17, Nick Østergaard wrote: >>> I think we should not disable the github plugin, but we may need to >>> remove it from the wizard in a way that does not emphasize that this is >>>

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

On 4/3/2018 7:12 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 03/04/2018 à 00:42, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : >> Things have quieted down quit a bit so we should be close to an rc2 >> release. I saw a 3D viewer crash report but it looks like it might be a >> video driver issue. Are there any other outstanding

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

Adam, Let's aim for some time this weekend. If you run into issues, please let me know and I can push it back until the macos packaging is ready. Thanks, Wayne On 4/2/2018 8:22 PM, Adam Wolf wrote: > We are making good progress on macOS packaging but are at least a few > days away from

Re: [Kicad-developers] Alternative presentation of Symbol properties

Are you not missing a lot of properties from that dialog with your screenshot, like the orientation? Or is this only to replace the "Fields" frame of the dialog? 2018-03-01 17:26 GMT+01:00 Jeff Young : > Technically yes, but even the existing dialog only lets you edit both. > > >

[Kicad-developers] Must tracks & vias of the same net be contiguous?

The clean-up algorithms depend on tracks & vias assigned to the same net to be grouped in the segment list. Is that supposed to be guaranteed? (I have a file where it is not the case.) ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to

Re: [Kicad-developers] Must tracks & vias of the same net be contiguous?

The track/via insertion routines have two modes: blind-append and insert-where-appropriate. The board parser current relies on the file being correct and uses append. Changing it to insert fixes the bug. I like this change because it makes us more resilient, and because it will fix any other

Re: [Kicad-developers] Must tracks & vias of the same net be contiguous?

On 4/3/2018 9:29 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > On 03/04/18 15:13, Jeff Young wrote: >> The clean-up algorithms depend on tracks & vias assigned to the same net to >> be grouped in the segment list. Is that supposed to be guaranteed? > > It is/used to be like this (there was/is a special

Re: [Kicad-developers] Must tracks & vias of the same net be contiguous?

On 03/04/18 15:13, Jeff Young wrote: > The clean-up algorithms depend on tracks & vias assigned to the same net to > be grouped in the segment list. Is that supposed to be guaranteed? It is/used to be like this (there was/is a special sorting function, called at least in the TRACK_CLEANER). I

Re: [Kicad-developers] Must tracks & vias of the same net be contiguous?

With the fix, TRACK::GetBestInsertPoint(BOARD*) takes 6.2% of a file load on a reasonably dense board. As points of comparison, BOARD::BuildConnectivity() takes 16.2% and 15.5%, and PCB_EDIT_FRAME::ReFillLayerWidget() 3.3%. (We could of course have a faster and more resilient load if we

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

Le 03/04/2018 à 14:06, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : > On 4/3/2018 7:12 AM, jp charras wrote: >> Le 03/04/2018 à 00:42, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : >>> Things have quieted down quit a bit so we should be close to an rc2 >>> release. I saw a 3D viewer crash report but it looks like it might be a >>>

[Kicad-developers] Meson Build system

Just found this on Linux Mint blog and it is looks promising - http://mesonbuild.com/ ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers

Re: [Kicad-developers] Meson Build system

yes it is great indeed. I did experimentally port Inkscape to meson a few weeks ago. 2018-04-03 14:13 GMT-03:00 Jakub Kozdon : > Just found this on Linux Mint blog and it is looks promising - > http://mesonbuild.com/ > > > ___ >

Re: [Kicad-developers] rc2

On 2018-04-02 06:42 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: Things have quieted down quit a bit so we should be close to an rc2 release. I saw a 3D viewer crash report but it looks like it might be a video driver issue. Are there any other outstanding issues we need to fix before rc2 is tagged? I am

Re: [Kicad-developers] Must tracks & vias of the same net be contiguous?

We also call SynchronizeNetsAndNetClasses() twice (once in NETINFO_LIST::buildListOfNets() and once immediately after returning from it). > On 3 Apr 2018, at 15:41, Jeff Young wrote: > > With the fix, TRACK::GetBestInsertPoint(BOARD*) takes 6.2% of a file load on > a

Re: [Kicad-developers] JetBrains

Wayne, CLion will work with MSYS2 btw but the findwxwidgets script in kicad is broken and can't find the paths correctly because for some reason a define or two I've never narrowed down keep making it think its win32 rather than msys2 with a unix tree. I think I normally butchered the script into

Re: [Kicad-developers] JetBrains

Mark, I already ran into that so I guess at some point I will have to see if I can fix this :( It would be nice if the wxwidgets project would use a build config method that works across platforms like pkg-config or cmake. Wayne On 4/3/2018 3:12 PM, Mark Roszko wrote: > Wayne, > > CLion will

Re: [Kicad-developers] Must tracks & vias of the same net be contiguous?

More data: 1) The double SynchronizeNetsAndNetClasses() costs almost nothing. We should leave it. 2) I did some testing having removed the second call to BuildConnectivity(). It’s definitely faster; may or may not be risky. 3) I solved the insert performance penalty. (Since files are

Re: [Kicad-developers] Resistor 2512 footprint [Kicad 4.07]

The kicad-developers list is not really for detailed library discussions like this. You may have better luck reporting the issue directly on https://github.com/kicad/kicad-footprints/issues I am not sure what the plan is, but I don't think the Librarians will update the old footprints, all

[Kicad-developers] Resistor 2512 footprint [Kicad 4.07]

Hi! I've had a an unpleasant surprise with a 2512 (imperial) smd resistor footprint (Resistors_SMD:R_2512_HandSoldering) available in the Kicad's official library (shame on me for not checking the dimensions before sending the gerbers). When our boards arrived we verified that the pads of this

Re: [Kicad-developers] Resistor 2512 footprint [Kicad 4.07]

You should be able to check the footprint just by looking at it in a text editor or online. That will be faster than compiling Kicad. https://github.com/KiCad/Resistors_SMD.pretty/blob/master/R_2512_HandSoldering.kicad_mod

Re: [Kicad-developers] Alternative presentation of Symbol properties

For the seldom-used stuff you can either go to the individual Edit Field dialog, or you can make more columns visible in the list (by right-clicking on the header). > On 3 Apr 2018, at 08:18, Nick Østergaard wrote: > > Are you not missing a lot of properties from that

Re: [Kicad-developers] Resistor 2512 footprint [Kicad 4.07]

Sorry for the noise, I'll try to compile the Kicad 5 rc2 and check if this issue persists in the new library. Thanks, Augusto Fraga Giachero. Nick Østergaard writes: > The kicad-developers list is not really for detailed library discussions > like this. You may have better luck reporting the