s left with now non-existing netcode.
Janis Skujenieks
=== modified file 'pcbnew/connect.cpp'
--- pcbnew/connect.cpp 2012-02-09 12:06:38 +
+++ pcbnew/connect.cpp 2012-02-09 12:41:38 +
@@ -39,6 +39,16 @@
#include "pcbnew.h"
+#define OLD_TRACK_NET 0
s left with now non-existing netcode.
Janis Skujenieks
=== modified file 'pcbnew/connect.cpp'
--- pcbnew/connect.cpp 2012-02-09 12:06:38 +
+++ pcbnew/connect.cpp 2012-02-09 12:41:38 +
@@ -39,6 +39,16 @@
#include "pcbnew.h"
+#define OLD_TRACK_NET 0
I will bring this up once more.
Are there any more opinions on this?
This is weird that nobody else feels this very inconvenient. How the rest
of you place stand alone via. I need this quite often. On the other hand if
this kind of feature is not supported, pcbnew shouldn't allow to start
track o
Yes, it wasn't the latest. I'll try to fix this.
On Feb 17, 2012 8:45 PM, "jean-pierre charras"
wrote:
>
> Le 09/02/2012 17:04, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
>
>> Janis
>>
>> 1) This PATCH is going to take some time to process, it will require
some discussion. In
>> any case it is not conformant to
I wrote my patch for net loosing problem based on revision 3428, hope this
helps.
=== modified file 'pcbnew/connect.cpp'
--- pcbnew/connect.cpp 2012-02-19 04:02:19 +
+++ pcbnew/connect.cpp 2012-02-21 23:49:28 +
@@ -39,12 +39,23 @@
#include
+
+#define OLD_TRACK_NET 0x4000
OK, I understand what your saying.
Jean-Pierre, maybe you can check the patch and give your thoughts on using
this kind of solution.
P.S. Thanks for the tips.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 02/21/2012 06:00 PM, Janis Skujenieks wrote:
>
> Offering a cr
47 PM, jean-pierre charras
wrote:
> Le 22/02/2012 16:51, Janis Skujenieks a écrit :
>
> OK, I understand what your saying.
>>
>> Jean-Pierre, maybe you can check the patch and give your thoughts on
>> using this kind of solution.
>>
>> P.S. Thanks for the
Hi
I've tested this patch on my most recent PCB and didn't see any problems.
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Wayne Stambaugh
wrote:
> On 6/1/2018 3:58 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> > On 01/06/18 20:23, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> >> I think maybe we are seeing the severity of these bugs different
I think you may have this problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1746753
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Chris Pavlina
wrote:
> Mostly empty toolbars, one missing toolbar, and a completely black,
> blank schematic.
>
> Arch Linux
> gtk2 2.24.32-1
> wxgtk2 3.0.3.1-11
>
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2
PM, Chris Pavlina
wrote:
> I'm confused - nickoe comments on that bug to rebuild with gtk2, but
> both the version info posted in the bug report and my own system
> indicate gtk2...
>
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 11:32:58PM +0200, Janis Skujenieks wrote:
> > I think
10 matches
Mail list logo