On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
> It was sort of like pulling on a string: first I put the library tree into
> the footprint editor, but it made it too slow to launch.
>
>
So then I added the fp-info-cache, but it was too slow checking the cache
> validity.
>
> So then came the
It was sort of like pulling on a string: first I put the library tree into the
footprint editor, but it made it too slow to launch.
So then I added the fp-info-cache, but it was too slow checking the cache
validity.
So then came the TimestampDir() changes. :)
Thanks for the help with it JP!
On 8/8/2018 2:12 PM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 08/08/2018 à 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> On 8/8/2018 10:09 AM, jp charras wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 08/08/2018 à 14:11, Jeff Young a écrit :
OK, accidental commit reverted, and attached is an updated patch.
(This time not done with diff
Le 08/08/2018 à 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> On 8/8/2018 10:09 AM, jp charras wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 08/08/2018 à 14:11, Jeff Young a écrit :
>>> OK, accidental commit reverted, and attached is an updated patch.
>>> (This time not done with diff rather than format-patch so I don’t
>>>
On 8/8/2018 10:09 AM, jp charras wrote:
>
>
> Le 08/08/2018 à 14:11, Jeff Young a écrit :
>> OK, accidental commit reverted, and attached is an updated patch.
>> (This time not done with diff rather than format-patch so I don’t
>> accidentally commit it again.)
>>
>>
>>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Attached
Le 08/08/2018 à 14:11, Jeff Young a écrit :
OK, accidental commit reverted, and attached is an updated patch. (This time
not done with diff rather than format-patch so I don’t accidentally commit it
again.)
Hi Jeff,
Attached a modified patch that fixes 2 compil issues
jp charras
OK, accidental commit reverted, and attached is an updated patch. (This time
not done with diff rather than format-patch so I don’t accidentally commit it
again.)
0002-MSW-timestamp-dir-patch.patch
Description: Binary data
> On 8 Aug 2018, at 12:39, Jeff Young wrote:
>
> Aw crap, I
Le 07/08/2018 à 22:21, Jeff Young a écrit :
> I think it applied OK. It appears to need some wx header files and some
> fixes in string handling.
>
> I could guess at them, but probably more efficient for someone on MSW.
Hi jeff.
The patch has 2 issues:
the std::string must be std::wstring.
I think it applied OK. It appears to need some wx header files and some fixes
in string handling.
I could guess at them, but probably more efficient for someone on MSW.
> On 7 Aug 2018, at 20:47, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>
> It looks lile the patch does not compile, but maybe the patch was
It looks lile the patch does not compile, but maybe the patch was not
applied correctly. You should be able to look at the patched code in the
workspace.
tir. 7. aug. 2018 21.39 skrev Nick Østergaard :
> I triggered this windows build with the patch.
>
>
I did some performance optimisations for POSIX kernels which hugely improves
the speed of time-stamping a directory of files. But it’s still (very) slow on
MSW.
I’ve written a version of the optimisation for MSW, but of course I can’t even
compile it, much less test it. Any volunteers?
11 matches
Mail list logo
