[kicad-users] Re: Mils
--- In kicad-users@yahoogroups.com, KeepIt SimpleStupid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's face it, humans like things easy. It's much easier to say 5 mills, than 5 thousanths of an inch, No, you would just say 5 thou' Ian
Re: [kicad-users] Re: Kicad + Borland CPP (Free Turbo Version)?
Do Not! fork out and use another compiler than the GCC. As the development of the GCC have been seen breaking some softwares and libraries, it would probably be a serious waste of time to start forking the makefiles for further compilers. Regarding quality - GCC is probably the most developed and checked compiler out there. Besides, the GCC is a free software and by that - available to anyone. I seriously doubt you will be able to find any serious shortcomings of GCC when compared to Borland. There are reasons behind the major C-compiler producers to compare their products with GCC. If you want to develop KiCad further, use GCC! If you have to add .NET functions, see to that they are compatible with MONO so we can compile them in fully open source environments. //Dan On Saturday 13 October 2007 19:55:37 drwrench wrote: Hi Dick, Thanks for the reply. I have not seen support for this compiler in the makefiles. Ok Do you realize what the quality level is for the GCC compiler suite that Kicad uses as standard? I don't know much about the recommended compiler but I did download it and will use it if I need to. I mainly develop using Borland tools for Java, C# and Pascal languages. I was hoping that if I could import Kicad into Borland CPP builder then everything would be under one IDE and I could tryout the possibilites of integrating parts of Kicad into other applications written in other languages. It's more out of interest at the moment as I have no real need to use any CAD package and don't want to learn a new compiler suite if I can avoid it for now. But in the future I may need CAD so would like to try things out early on if I can and I thought the Borland route would be the easiest way for me.
[kicad-users] Re: Kicad + Borland CPP (Free Turbo Version)?
--- In kicad-users@yahoogroups.com, Dan Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do Not! fork out and use another compiler than the GCC. As the development of the GCC have been seen breaking some softwares and libraries, it would probably be a serious waste of time to start forking the makefiles for further compilers. Regarding quality - GCC is probably the most developed and checked compiler out there. Besides, the GCC is a free software and by that - available to anyone. I seriously doubt you will be able to find any serious shortcomings of GCC when compared to Borland. There are reasons behind the major C-compiler producers to compare their products with GCC. If you want to develop KiCad further, use GCC! If you have to add .NET functions, see to that they are compatible with MONO so we can compile them in fully open source environments. //Dan On Saturday 13 October 2007 19:55:37 drwrench wrote: Hi Dick, Thanks for the reply. I have not seen support for this compiler in the makefiles. Ok Do you realize what the quality level is for the GCC compiler suite that Kicad uses as standard? I don't know much about the recommended compiler but I did download it and will use it if I need to. I mainly develop using Borland tools for Java, C# and Pascal languages. I was hoping that if I could import Kicad into Borland CPP builder then everything would be under one IDE and I could tryout the possibilites of integrating parts of Kicad into other applications written in other languages. It's more out of interest at the moment as I have no real need to use any CAD package and don't want to learn a new compiler suite if I can avoid it for now. But in the future I may need CAD so would like to try things out early on if I can and I thought the Borland route would be the easiest way for me.
