>The file (dxflib_commercial_license.txt) that give some info on >dxflib licence in the downloaded dxflib was very unclear. >In fact the dxflib site is unclear and very poor about the license: >The dxflib license appears only in a FAQ ...
Yes, it is indeed rather vague on their website. However, the source code files themselves do contain a "short form" reference to the GPL: ** This file may be distributed and/or modified under the terms of the ** GNU General Public License version 2 as published by the Free Software ** Foundation and appearing in the file LICENSE.GPL included in the ** packaging of this file. so it looks like it is okay for use in GPL'd projects. Also, FYI, the library seemed to build okay under a default MinGW 5.1.4 installation. Haven't done anything with it yet, though. ;-)
