[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:59:53PM -0400, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
>> On 7/19/06, David Stanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> It looks like this may be caused by a patch for ticket 66[0] being
>>> at least partially rolled back. So I have attached another patch[1]
>>> to that
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:59:53PM -0400, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> On 7/19/06, David Stanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It looks like this may be caused by a patch for ticket 66[0] being
> > at least partially rolled back. So I have attached another patch[1]
> > to that ticket. Since I don't get t
On 7/19/06, David Stanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like this may be caused by a patch for ticket 66[0] being
> at least partially rolled back. So I have attached another patch[1]
> to that ticket. Since I don't get the error I will rely on someone
> that does to try the patch and see if
David Stanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It looks like this may be caused by a patch for ticket 66[0] being
> at least partially rolled back. So I have attached another patch[1]
> to that ticket. Since I don't get the error I will rely on someone
> that does to try the patch and see if it works.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:10:30AM -0400, Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> I'm seeing reports of problems with Kid 0.9.2 and comments in base
> templates (something that was working previously...)
>
> I hope this is an easy one to re-fix...
>
> Kevin
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jon
