[Kim-discussion] why should I use KIM?

Hi All, in my recent studies I learned that KIM annotates in the text entities already present in the KB. If I want to annotate in the text entities that are not in the KB, for example I want that a new Person presents in a text (e.g. James Blunt) is annotated like Singer (which is a my class

[Kim-discussion] why should I use KIM? (2)

Hi All, in my recent studies I learned that KIM annotates in the text entities already present in the KB. If I want to annotate in the text entities that are not in the KB, for example I want that a new Person presents in a text (e.g. James Blunt) is annotated like Singer (which is a my class

Re: [Kim-discussion] Fwd:KIM semantic annotation

Hi Enzo, Your english is perfect! First of all, there is a big chance, that the name in the text is recognized as a Person. Several different approaches are used for this purpose. First, there may be an exact match of course with a known person from the KB (Knowledge Base). Several other

Re: [Kim-discussion] why should I use KIM? (2)

Hi Valentina, Thank you for your big interest in KIM. You can find the information you need in this post - http://www.mail-archive.com/kim-discussion@ontotext.com/msg00476.html . Good luck, Philip Valentina De Vivo wrote: Hi All, in my recent studies I learned that KIM annotates in the