Re: [Kim-discussion] Issues with creating owl files

2010-11-29 Thread Philip Alexiev @ Ontotext
Hi Bonnie, We are following the discussion and working on the issue. I suggest we continue this on personal mail to not distract the others. We should be able to resolve this in the next couple of hours. All the best, Philip On Nov 29, 2010, at 2:44 PM, VERMILLION, Bonnie wrote: > Also, Phi

Re: [Kim-discussion] Issues with creating owl files

2010-11-28 Thread VERMILLION, Bonnie
Thanks, Phillip. Bonnie From: Philip Alexiev@ [Ontotext philip.alex...@ontotext.com] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 6:53 AM To: VERMILLION, Bonnie Cc: WILSON, Greg; borislav popov; Matthew Petrillo; mailing-list mailing-list Subject: Re: Issues with creat

Re: [Kim-discussion] Issues with creating owl files

2010-11-28 Thread VERMILLION, Bonnie
Thanks, Phillip for the explanation. Bonnie From: Philip Alexiev@ [Ontotext philip.alex...@ontotext.com] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 6:53 AM To: VERMILLION, Bonnie Cc: WILSON, Greg; borislav popov; Matthew Petrillo; mailing-list mailing-list Subject: R

Re: [Kim-discussion] Issues with creating owl files

2010-11-28 Thread Philip Alexiev @ Ontotext
Hi Bonnie I will try to draw the complete picture in this mail. It is perfectly true, that you can run KIM with a completely new ontology. Importing the RDF in OWLIM is only the first part of the process. After this you will have to make the resources you use for IE aware of the new ontology.