Hi Robert, thanks for the nudge. I agree, it's a confusing name.
I've added a clarification in the documentation, and updated news in 0260c0a

Marek

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Robert Edmonds <edmo...@debian.org>
Date: 29 August 2014 03:44
Subject: Re: [knot-dns-users] multimaster docs?
To: knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz


Hi,

Would it be possible to pick a slightly less confusing name for this
feature?  Maybe something like "XFR master failover".  At first I
thought of this:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-master_replication

E.g., in a DNS context:

    https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2012-August/088413.html

    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc959273.aspx

Marek Vavruša wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> there isn't much to point. The `xfr-in` clause in the configuration
> accepts multiple remotes.
> The first in the list is treated as primary, and should it fail, the
> next would be used as a failover.
> We don't support any load balancing of forwarded updates nor transfers
> between the masters,
> or any other tricky operations.
>
> Best,
> Marek
>
> On 28 August 2014 16:41, Nicolás Reynolds <fa...@endefensadelsl.org> wrote:
> >
> > hi, i see knot 1.5.0 has multimaster support but i can't find more
> > info/docs on this, can you point me to it?
> >
> > --
> >  D
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > knot-dns-users mailing list
> > knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz
> > https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> knot-dns-users mailing list
> knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz
> https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users

--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users
_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users

Reply via email to