Hi Robert, thanks for the nudge. I agree, it's a confusing name. I've added a clarification in the documentation, and updated news in 0260c0a
Marek ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Robert Edmonds <edmo...@debian.org> Date: 29 August 2014 03:44 Subject: Re: [knot-dns-users] multimaster docs? To: knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz Hi, Would it be possible to pick a slightly less confusing name for this feature? Maybe something like "XFR master failover". At first I thought of this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-master_replication E.g., in a DNS context: https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2012-August/088413.html http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc959273.aspx Marek Vavruša wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > there isn't much to point. The `xfr-in` clause in the configuration > accepts multiple remotes. > The first in the list is treated as primary, and should it fail, the > next would be used as a failover. > We don't support any load balancing of forwarded updates nor transfers > between the masters, > or any other tricky operations. > > Best, > Marek > > On 28 August 2014 16:41, Nicolás Reynolds <fa...@endefensadelsl.org> wrote: > > > > hi, i see knot 1.5.0 has multimaster support but i can't find more > > info/docs on this, can you point me to it? > > > > -- > > D > > > > _______________________________________________ > > knot-dns-users mailing list > > knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz > > https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users > > > _______________________________________________ > knot-dns-users mailing list > knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz > https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users -- Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org _______________________________________________ knot-dns-users mailing list knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users _______________________________________________ knot-dns-users mailing list knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users