Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-07-02 Thread Peter Hudec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 any way, the knot do not support catalog zones at this moment and at least in my /still not using knot/ the hacks are only way to implement such a provisioning. For ccTLD I do not see any need for this feature , since the number of zones do not

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-07-02 Thread Ondřej Surý
> On 2 Jul 2018, at 12:45, Petr Špaček wrote: > > On 2.7.2018 12:28, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Am 18.06.2018 um 11:16 schrieb Peter Hudec: >>> if you want dns server agnostic solution, look at >>> http://dotat.at/prog/nsnotifyd/ >>> >>> combine it with the >>>

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-07-02 Thread Daniel Salzman
On 07/02/2018 12:45 PM, Petr Špaček wrote: > On 2.7.2018 12:28, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Am 18.06.2018 um 11:16 schrieb Peter Hudec: >>> if you want dns server agnostic solution, look at >>> http://dotat.at/prog/nsnotifyd/ >>> >>> combine it with the >>>

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-07-02 Thread Petr Špaček
On 2.7.2018 12:28, Klaus Darilion wrote: > Am 18.06.2018 um 11:16 schrieb Peter Hudec: >> if you want dns server agnostic solution, look at >> http://dotat.at/prog/nsnotifyd/ >> >> combine it with the >> https://jpmens.net/2013/02/13/automatic-provisioning-of-slave-dns-server >> s/. >> >> Add a

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-07-02 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 18.06.2018 um 11:16 schrieb Peter Hudec: > if you want dns server agnostic solution, look at > http://dotat.at/prog/nsnotifyd/ > > combine it with the > https://jpmens.net/2013/02/13/automatic-provisioning-of-slave-dns-server > s/. > > Add a little bit integration coding and that's it. :)

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-06-18 Thread Peter Hudec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 if you want dns server agnostic solution, look at http://dotat.at/prog/nsnotifyd/ combine it with the https://jpmens.net/2013/02/13/automatic-provisioning-of-slave-dns-server s/. Add a little bit integration coding and that's it. :) Peter

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-06-16 Thread Mark Jeftovic
PowerDNS does the dynamic adding of slave zones via "supermasters" https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/modes-of-operation.html#supermaster-automatic-provisioning-of-slaves - mark On 2018-06-15 2:53 AM, Daniel Salzman wrote: > Hi Antti, > > As far as I know, catalog zones are implemented by

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-06-15 Thread Daniel Salzman
Hi Antti, As far as I know, catalog zones are implemented by Bind only and still it's in a draft state. We haven't decided yet how and when to implement this or alternative functionality. Daniel On 06/15/2018 05:34 AM, Antti Ristimäki wrote: > Hi list, > > This was a very good question, as for

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-06-14 Thread Antti Ristimäki
Hi list, This was a very good question, as for example we have sometimes investigated the possibility to dynamically configure zones by incoming notify messages. This leads me to a question, whether or not Knot is going to support catalog zones? Or is the whole catalog zone concept only Bind

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-06-14 Thread Daniel Salzman
On 06/14/2018 05:06 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > On 14/06/2018 16:58, Mark Jeftovic wrote: > > Hi Mark, > >> I misread the docs, sorry and thanks for the reply. I thought it worked >> similar to the PowerDNS supermaster concept. > > Yes, I had assumed that you had mixed it up with the PowerDNS

Re: [knot-dns-users] logging inbound NOTIFY?

2018-06-14 Thread Mark Jeftovic
On 2018-06-13 2:23 AM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > On 12/06/2018 23:43, Mark Jeftovic wrote: > > Hi Mark, > >> My understanding is when the server receives a notify from an authorized >> master, if it is not already in the zone like it will add it and AXFR >> it, right? > No, it doesn't work that