[Koha] Did you mean koha

Good morning We are trying to use 'Did you mean' Explode Terms in Koha but we have not been able to make it work, it always return us 0 results. We have checked the authorities field and it seems it is property configured screenshot: https://postimg.org/image/c6w250nuv/ We have reindex zebra,

Re: [Koha] Curious behaviour with batch modified records - ghost fields

We've found the problem, it's not with Koha. Thanks On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jonathan Druart < jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-community.org> wrote: > Hello Elaine, > > Is 245$h linked with a koha field? > Did you keep a version of the record before you managed to remove the > "ghost" field? If

Re: [Koha] Change in behavior after upgrade

I figured this out, just want to post in case anyone runs into this in the future and has the same problem. The Apache directive controlling this is the Multiviews Option being declared on the Apache root directory, like this: Options Indexes FollowSymlinks Multiviews

Re: [Koha] remove all patron pictures

Thank you Sir, That should do it !! -S On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Indranil Das Gupta wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Scott Owen wrote: > > > A quick look at the Koha SQL tables shows a "patronimage" table.my > > guess is

Re: [Koha] remove all patron pictures

Hi Scott, On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Scott Owen wrote: > A quick look at the Koha SQL tables shows a "patronimage" table.my > guess is that these are the images saved as a "blob" (or something like > that). > > Can I safely delete the table data (borrowernumber /

[Koha] remove all patron pictures

Hi all, I have been asked to remove all of our patron (student) photos from one site...due to the photos causing a slowdown in rendering the checkout page. (I just added the photos last week...) A quick look at the Koha SQL tables shows a "patronimage" table.my guess is that these are

Re: [Koha] Z39.50 - internal server error

Greetings, My guess is that the local changes probably create a circular use. Which is why the qualification with C4:... is necessary. Did the local changes include any use statements? :) GPML, Mark Tompsett ___ Koha mailing list

Re: [Koha] Z39.50 - internal server error

El lun., 14 nov. 2016 a las 9:28, Radek Šiman () escribió: > development process. Is there any reason why "undefined subroutine" > error raises because of plack? PLease remember, the restart always fixes > the problem as well as prefixing the procedure name. But the

Re: [Koha] Z39.50 - internal server error

Hi Jonathan, I think it's the latest version available: 16.05.04.001. The local changes are focused on authorities searching as I think, but I'm not absolutely sure (isn't my work). It's just my opinion that about the local changes, so we didn't try to run without it - in addition it's a bit

Re: [Koha] Z39.50 - internal server error

Hi Radek, Which version of Koha are you running on? What are you local changes? Did you try without? Cheers, Jonathan On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 at 08:49 wrote: > Hi, > > sometimes we are facing very annoying problem concerning Z39.50 > searching, bacause all attempt to

Re: [Koha] Empty list on Authorized Values after upgrade to 16.05.05

Hi Zeno, It works with: [mysqld] sql_mode=IGNORE_SPACE,NO_ZERO_IN_DATE,NO_ZERO_DATE,ERROR_FOR_DIVISION_BY_ZERO,NO_AUTO_CREATE_USER,NO_ENGINE_SUBSTITUTION Now I can make reservations :) I will post any feedback from librarians if something fails. Thank you - Koha version: 16.05.05