On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 03:58:15PM +0100, Paul Poulain wrote:
> wow, did you need load balancing for performance reasons, or was it just by
> choice ?
For redundancy. I can take any involved server down and the rest will
keep running without any interruption of service to the end users. For
hello,
wow, did you need load balancing for performance reasons, or was it just
by choice ?
We're supporting a library that has 1M biblios, 1.7M items, 300+ issues
and 70k+ patrons, and they don't need load balancing at all. It's hosted
on their platform, virtualised with VMWare. They had
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 04:46:59PM +0100, Paul Poulain wrote:
> Can you share the metrics of the Koha DB ? (# of biblios, # of yearly
> issues, # of patrons, # of librarians, ...)
Yearly issues 260k (not counting renewals)
Patronrecords: 68k
200 libray staff
2.4M biblios
2.4M items
--
Dave
Hi Dave,
Can you share the metrics of the Koha DB ? (# of biblios, # of yearly
issues, # of patrons, # of librarians, ...)
Le 04/12/2018 à 14:06, Dave Sherohman a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 02:35:39PM +0200, Mutsikiwa Admire wrote:
Just wondering if it is possible to have a Koha
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 02:35:39PM +0200, Mutsikiwa Admire wrote:
> Just wondering if it is possible to have a Koha implementation in which we
> have a front-end Load Balancer such as NGINX or HAProxy, several Koha web
> server instances powered by one database server running on a separate server
Hi
Just wondering if it is possible to have a Koha implementation in which we
have a front-end Load Balancer such as NGINX or HAProxy, several Koha web
server instances powered by one database server running on a separate server
with balancing from source with stick-table in the case of
6 matches
Mail list logo
