Re: [Koha] 403 After Upgrade (Fwd: [Koha Library Software Community] Comment: Koha 3.2.2 is now available)

2011-09-07 Thread Perch
I have this problem with koha 3.4. I don't think it's to do with file
permissions, but rather apache configuration. Does anyone have an idea how
this could be fixed?

--
View this message in context: 
http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/403-After-Upgrade-Fwd-Koha-Library-Software-Community-Comment-Koha-3-2-2-is-now-available-tp3331835p4778098.html
Sent from the Koha - Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


Re: [Koha] 403 error with Koha 3.4.4

2011-09-07 Thread Perch
I've put them in pastebin:

Here's httpd.conf: http://pastebin.com/8Wy07Vns

It's pretty much unchanged, except for the servername (which I removed from
pastebin, but it's set) and the inclusion of the koha-httpd.conf.

koha-httpd.conf is here: http://pastebin.com/tQKC0Sfj

Apache runs as apache:apache and koha files are owned by koha:users.

--
View this message in context: 
http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/403-error-with-Koha-3-4-4-tp4778142p4778309.html
Sent from the Koha - Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


Re: [Koha] OPAC error

2011-09-07 Thread Tom Hanstra
Thanks, but either this is not the problem or I don't know how to set 
the cookie properly.


How can I properly check whether the KohaOpacLanguage cookie is set?

Thanks,
Tom

On 09/06/2011 07:49 PM, Robin Sheat wrote:

Tom Hanstra schreef op di 06-09-2011 om 15:06 [-0400]:

Can someone point me to some clues on what is going on to cause this
error?

Possibly this:

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6205

Check your cookies.



--


-
 Tom Hanstra  Systems Administrator
 Hesburgh Libraries of Notre Dame Phone: (574)631-4686
 213 Hesburgh Library Email: t...@nd.edu
 Notre Dame, IN  46556

 Every day, from here to there, funny things are everywhere.
 Dr. Seuss
-

___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


Re: [Koha] Checked In Status on Reports

2011-09-07 Thread Nicole Engard
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz wrote:
 SELECT title,author,barcode FROM biblio,items WHERE
 biblio.biblionumber=items.biblionumber AND items.itype ='you item type
 goes here' AND (items.onloan is NULL or items.onloan = '')

 Thats two ' not one  :)

Or you can do this:

SELECT title,author,barcode FROM biblio,items WHERE
biblio.biblionumber=items.biblionumber AND items.itype = Item
Type|itemtypes AND (items.onloan is NULL or items.onloan = '')


So that it asks you for an item type and you don't have to edit again later.

Nicole
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


[Koha] KohaCon 2012 Voting

2011-09-07 Thread BWS Johnson
Kia ora!

Apologies to all, I screwed up. I thought voting for KohaCon 2012 started on 1 
October. It's meant to close then. That's a big oops. We're hoping that nengard 
will ride to the rescue and get the survey out and about based on what we did 
last time for KohaCon 2011. If you don't want to, Nicole, we will figure out a 
fall back.

Humbly,
Brooke
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


[Koha] Migration from Heritage to Koha

2011-09-07 Thread Jean Francois Bucas
Dear Koha mailing list members,

like anywhere else, from time to time, a success story is greatly welcomed.

In the case of our small library, until last month, we were using
Heritage[1], a Windows based proprietary ILS. We didn't like it, both
for technical reasons and functional reasons.

It took the combined efforts of the IT-guy (myself) and the librarian to
export the data and process it in a way that was importable in Koha.
After a few weeks, overcoming many small and big challenges, we are very
happy to introduce our new system to our users, and to this date, no
complain at all.

If you are interested in the result and the steps of the migration, you
can have a look at theses addresses:

http://library.stp.dias.ie
http://www.stp.dias.ie/library/Heritage2Koha/howto.txt

Thanks a lot to the Koha community!

Kind regards,
Jef

[1] http://www.isoxford.com/
-- 
Jean-Francois Bucas
IT System Administrator
School of Theoretical Physics
Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
10 Burlington Road
Dublin 4
Tel. +353 1 614 0132
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


Re: [Koha] Migration from Heritage to Koha

2011-09-07 Thread James Ghiorzi
Wow, Congratulations, and welcome to Koha.

James Ghiorzi
Library Assistant II
San Benito County Free Library
470 Fifth St.
Hollister, CA 95023


From: koha-boun...@lists.katipo.co.nz [koha-boun...@lists.katipo.co.nz] On 
Behalf Of Jean Francois Bucas [jfbu...@stp.dias.ie]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:01 AM
To: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
Subject: [Koha] Migration from Heritage to Koha

Dear Koha mailing list members,

like anywhere else, from time to time, a success story is greatly welcomed.

In the case of our small library, until last month, we were using
Heritage[1], a Windows based proprietary ILS. We didn't like it, both
for technical reasons and functional reasons.

It took the combined efforts of the IT-guy (myself) and the librarian to
export the data and process it in a way that was importable in Koha.
After a few weeks, overcoming many small and big challenges, we are very
happy to introduce our new system to our users, and to this date, no
complain at all.

If you are interested in the result and the steps of the migration, you
can have a look at theses addresses:

http://library.stp.dias.ie
http://www.stp.dias.ie/library/Heritage2Koha/howto.txt

Thanks a lot to the Koha community!

Kind regards,
Jef

[1] http://www.isoxford.com/
--
Jean-Francois Bucas
IT System Administrator
School of Theoretical Physics
Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
10 Burlington Road
Dublin 4
Tel. +353 1 614 0132
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


Re: [Koha] Migration from Heritage to Koha

2011-09-07 Thread BWS Johnson
Kia ora!


       Up Baile Átha Cliath! Bail ó Dhia ar an obair. Thanks for the 
documentation. :D


Cheers,
Brooke

 http://library.stp.dias.ie
 http://www.stp.dias.ie/library/Heritage2Koha/howto.txt
 
 Thanks a lot to the Koha community!
 
 Kind regards,
 Jef
 
 [1] http://www.isoxford.com/
 -- 
 Jean-Francois Bucas
 IT System Administrator
 School of Theoretical Physics
 Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
 10 Burlington Road
 Dublin 4
 Tel. +353 1 614 0132
 ___
 Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
 Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
 http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


[Koha] New to the list-- questions about BISAC

2011-09-07 Thread Randy Smith
Our library consortium is in the initial stages of moving from Ex Libris 
to Koha with an entirely new LIS administrator.  The administrator we 
are considering suggested that I join the list as a place to get answers 
and advice from people who are using a Koha generated LIS.I am a 
reference librarian assigned the task of coming up with the right 
questions to ask as we go through the process of setting up the profile 
of what we want our Koha system to do.  The list moderator suggested I 
introduce myself in  my first post.  Thanks for your patience.


Now for my first question.  We have also decided to drop DDC as a 
classification system and change to a modification of the BISAC (Book 
Industry Study Group) headings. For example, instead of 579.17 Dunn we 
will have Medical--Microbiology--Dunn.
Does anyone have any experience using BISAC instead of DDC when using 
Koha?  What MARC field(s) did you use for classification?  Is there any 
reason to include the BISAC alpha-numeric code that accompanies each 
term in  the MARC field? (in this example MED 052000).

Thanks.

Randy Smith
Lewiston City Library
208. 743-6519
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


[Koha] Commentary on Paul's Koha 3.8 Release Manager proposal

2011-09-07 Thread Ian Walls
Everyone,


Enclosed is my response to Paul Poulain's proposal for Koha 3.8 Release
Manager.  The details of his document can be found here:
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Proposal_paul_p_RM38

I thoroughly agree that the time has come to start thinking beyond the next
stable release, and on to Koha 4.0.  Those of you who have seen either my
presentation at KohaCon 2010's hackfest or KUDOScon 2011 know I'm very
excited about the possibilities of where we can take Koha in it's next major
iteration.  However, I disagree with a couple of the details of Paul's
proposal.

The major disagreement is with the timeline.  The proposal as it stands is
to start working on Koha 3.8 and Koha 4.0 in parallel, with Koha 3.8
releasing April 2012, and Koha 4.0 releasing Oct. 2012.  I feel that going
from Koha 3.8 directly to 4.0 is unwarranted.  To my mind, there are many
possible releases between 3.8 and 4.0, like 3.10, 3.12, 3.14 and so forth.
This is supported by the actual database version numbers in Koha: the
current release is actually 3.04.04; the zeros are squashed out for
convenience.

I would counter that, while we should continue releasing new features every
6 months on the 3.X line, Koha 4.0 should be defined by it's features.
Paul's proposal calls several features to be key, including Solr
integration, database abstraction, updated online help, improved
authentication stack and automated tests.  I agree that all these things are
important and should be worked towards, but I'm not convinced they should be
the sum total of the changes that define Koha 4.0

I would like to see the following in Koha 4.0:

   - arbitrary metadata formats (beyond MARC)
   - arbitrary biblio relationships
   - full support for authority records, including uploading through the
   GUI, automatic linking, explode searching and more
   - improvements to the borrower data structure (fewer pre-defined data
   fields, more flexibility)
   - separation of receiving and payment in acquisitions
   - serials import and export (MFHD, prediction patterns, etc)
   - many, many more things

I think that the community should meet and discuss what features are both
desirable and reasonably likely to be completed in the next few years (is
there interest by libraries to sponsor these developments, or from
developers to code it for fun?).

Once a feature set is agreed on to define Koha 4.0, the developers of
these features would meet to hash out what underlying structural changes
would be required to make them happen.  Hopefully commonalities could be
found, so that the underlying structure could be developed in a way that
accommodates multiple developments at once.  Identifying these prerequisite
changes early on would reduce the difficulties of rebasing developments,
since we'd all be working off a similar set of base assumptions.  It would
also provide a reasonable basis for excluding or delaying developments that
don't fit into the overall plan.

Once the features were chosen and a framework for their development agreed
upon, it would be time to code.  The development and submission process
would be the same as it is now (basing patches off master and submitting to
the patches listserv and Bugzilla).  As new features become ready, they
would be incorporated into the time-based 3.X releases by the release
manager for that particular cycle.  This way, what works is made available,
and what needs more time continues to be tested until it's stable for
production use.  Once all the agreed upon features were ready, it would be
time to release Koha 4.0.  Hopefully, that would be with 1-2 years, but
there would be flexibility here.

One of my other issues with the proposal was the lightening of Quality
Assurance standards for the first 3 months of the 3.8 release cycle.  If
operating under the 1 year time frame for Koha 4.0 as outlined in Paul's
proposal, this would seem necessary in order to get everything included in
time.  Unfortunately, while the next 3 months would be dedicated to clean up
of features rolled in, there is never any guarantee of bug fixes being
generated in a timely fashion.  You cannot force people to write or sign off
on bug fixes; we're all free agents here.  So code that has not been
rigourously tested could get in and stay in for a long time, long after 4.0
would release, because no one knows how to test it or fix it.

However, if we operate under my proposed model, all code could continue to
operate under the same quality assurance standards, and nothing that is
broken or otherwise incomplete would make it in until it was ready.
Releases would still come out every 6 months, even if a major development
was inoperable, until that development could be completed.

This has been a long email, so let me sum up.  I think:

   - we should continue to release Koha 3.8, 3.10, 3.12 etc on 6 month
   cycles using the current community practices for feature inclusion
   - we should, as a community, meet and decide what features we want to

Re: [Koha] Migration from Heritage to Koha

2011-09-07 Thread Lori Bowen Ayre
Congratulations and thanks for making your contribution!

Lori

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Jean Francois Bucas jfbu...@stp.dias.iewrote:

 Dear Koha mailing list members,

 like anywhere else, from time to time, a success story is greatly welcomed.

 In the case of our small library, until last month, we were using
 Heritage[1], a Windows based proprietary ILS. We didn't like it, both
 for technical reasons and functional reasons.

 It took the combined efforts of the IT-guy (myself) and the librarian to
 export the data and process it in a way that was importable in Koha.
 After a few weeks, overcoming many small and big challenges, we are very
 happy to introduce our new system to our users, and to this date, no
 complain at all.

 If you are interested in the result and the steps of the migration, you
 can have a look at theses addresses:

 http://library.stp.dias.ie
 http://www.stp.dias.ie/library/Heritage2Koha/howto.txt

 Thanks a lot to the Koha community!

 Kind regards,
 Jef

 [1] http://www.isoxford.com/
 --
 Jean-Francois Bucas
 IT System Administrator
 School of Theoretical Physics
 Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
 10 Burlington Road
 Dublin 4
 Tel. +353 1 614 0132
 ___
 Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
 Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
 http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha


Re: [Koha] Migration from Heritage to Koha

2011-09-07 Thread Vimal Kumar
Dear Jef,

I appreciate your effort behind Koha migration from Heritage.
You have customized Koha OPAC well.

Can you tell how to:

display book covers?
display of subject cloud?

Regards,



-- 
Vimal Kumar V.
Mahatma Gandhi University Library
Kottayam, Kerala- 686 560
Web: www.vimalkumar.org
Blog: http://linuxhalwa.blogspot.com
---
I forget what I was taught. I only remember what I have learnt
-Patrick White
___
Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha