Re: [Koha] Koha pluging for linking fields and RDA -76X-78X fields

2022-06-16 Thread Mercedes Portugal
dont see this designator in your examples. By the way. do you know what is supposed to be exactly subfield $4 relationship. We just checked that in Spain they are using it as a code for the relationship, but there are no codes in RDAit is confused Mercedes Portugal De: "Heat

Re: [Koha] Koha pluging for linking fields and RDA -76X-78X fields

2022-06-14 Thread Mercedes Portugal
it on the 22.05 I would like to know how are you linking recods with 76x-77x marc fields in Koha with 21.05 version. Yeah sure, I will watch that video as we will use 78x fields as well. -- Mg. Mercedes Portugal Biblioteca Cnl. Manuel José Olascoaga Instituto Geográfico Nacional http

[Koha] Koha pluging for linking fields and RDA -76X-78X fields

2022-06-14 Thread Mercedes Portugal
is actually implementing RDA in full? using relationships fields 76x-78x? Thanks a lot! -- Mg. Mercedes Portugal Biblioteca Cnl. Manuel José Olascoaga Instituto Geográfico Nacional [ http://www.ign.gob.ar/ | http://www.ign.gob.ar ] Av. Cabildo 381 – C.A.B.A. – CP: 1426 Tel: [ callto:011 4576 5576

[Koha] Trouble with Zebra indexes in 22.05 version

2022-08-11 Thread Mercedes Portugal
Does anyone know what may be happening? Thanks!! -- Mg. Mercedes Portugal Biblioteca Cnl. Manuel José Olascoaga Instituto Geográfico Nacional http://www.ign.gob.ar Av. Cabildo 381 – C.A.B.A. – CP: 1426 Tel: 011 4576 5576 interno 172

Re: [Koha] Koha Digest, Vol 202, Issue 11

2022-08-12 Thread Mercedes Portugal
Thanks Katrin! I dont understand why in Administration-Koha-to-MARC mappings we see the following already set in the system: biblio.biblionumber 774 w Record control number biblio.biblionumber 999 c Koha biblionumber Field 774 w should not be there -- Mg. Mercedes Portugal