Additionally, if you have bibliographic records without any items
(electronic resources) you will need an itemtype at the bib level (942c) to
allow for patrons to search for that type of resource.
-joy
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Owen Leonard wrote:
> > What is the
> What is the necessity of calling "Item type" (942c) at Record level
> instead of calling it as "record type".
> Circulation rules are defined for ITEMS which are associated with a RECORD.
ByWater Solutions posted something about this recently. The short
answer is that without a biblio-level
it might be a silly question, but I believe, similar question has been
asked in the forum before but I did not get clarified.
since "item type" is used for defining circulation rules, "Item Type"
(952y) at "Item" level sounds good.
What is the necessity of calling "Item type" (942c) at Record
+1
On 01-Apr-2016 7:07 PM, "Indranil Das Gupta" wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2016 7:03 PM, "Joy Nelson" wrote:
> >
> > Satish-
> > The benefit of having
> > two itemtypes is that it may be more clear to your users that one is
> > REFERENCE and the other is a
On Apr 1, 2016 7:03 PM, "Joy Nelson" wrote:
>
> Satish-
> The benefit of having
> two itemtypes is that it may be more clear to your users that one is
> REFERENCE and the other is a 'normal' BOOK.
+1
> Joy
>
___
Koha mailing
Satish-
Yes you can use multiple itemtypes on one bibliographic record. Both of
the options you list would work in your situation. The benefit of having
two itemtypes is that it may be more clear to your users that one is
REFERENCE and the other is a 'normal' BOOK.
Joy
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at
Hi,
I have a basic question regarding Item Type.
Item Type is required for Circulation Policy settings and Report generation,
etc.
For a Single Bibliographic RECORD (book) having 2 copies (ITEM), Say
example,
Item Type 1 = "Book" meant for Circulation and
Item Type 2 ="Reference Book" meant
7 matches
Mail list logo