https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Martin Renvoize changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Passed QA |Pushed to master
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #21 from Martin Renvoize ---
Nice work!
Pushed to master for 19.11.00
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #20 from Nick Clemens ---
I think this one can move ahead, ES is still in flux and we have decisions to
make
Even if 20589 removes the ability to search this when it goes in we can easily
restore it
I would love to see
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Nick Clemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #87440|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Nick Clemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Signed Off |Passed QA
Patch
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #19 from Nick Clemens ---
Created attachment 92452
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=92452=edit
Bug 22258: Increase Elasticsearch maximum field count to 1
Increases maximum field
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #17 from Nick Clemens ---
(In reply to Alex Arnaud from comment #16)
> All is working here and i don't have any QA warning.
>
> But i have concerns about Bug 20589. This last disable searching on _all and
> could make
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #16 from Alex Arnaud ---
All is working here and i don't have any QA warning.
But i have concerns about Bug 20589. This last disable searching on _all and
could make this one useless. Am i right ?
if (yes) {
Ere,
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Alex Arnaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact||alex.arn...@biblibre.com
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #15 from Michal Denar ---
Created attachment 87441
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=87441=edit
Bug 22258: Increase Elasticsearch maximum field count to 1
Increases maximum field
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Michal Denar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #87436|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Michal Denar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off
--
You are
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #13 from Ere Maijala ---
Right. We have some new index fields and together with the MARC record as array
they blew the Elasticsearch default limit of 1000 fields per record. I added
configuration to raise the limit to
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #85158|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff
--
You are
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #12 from Ere Maijala ---
Created attachment 87437
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=87437=edit
Bug 22258: Increase Elasticsearch maximum field count to 1
Increases maximum field count
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Michal Denar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blac...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Marjorie Barry-Vila changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clemens ---
(In reply to Ere Maijala from comment #7)
Yes, this seems an easy way to ensure the whole record can be searchable, I
like it as an optional format. Will test when I can
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #7 from Ere Maijala ---
So, the patch allows one to change the format MARC is stored in Elasticsearch.
Additionally the new field type uses default search field settings that cause
the content to be indexed in _all for
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|Needs Signoff
--
You are
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #6 from Ere Maijala ---
Created attachment 85158
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=85158=edit
Bug 22258: Elasticsearch: Add array as an alternative MARC format
Adds preference
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #5 from Ere Maijala ---
Ah, yes :) Then again you could already add rules for all MARC fields, it's
just more cumbersome.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Legrand ---
He he, I just fear the moment when my librarian colleagues will know about this
option :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #3 from Ere Maijala ---
Nicolas, don't worry, it will be completely optional. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Ere Maijala changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Legrand ---
Hey Nick,
thank you for working on ES!
I think we have a better relevancy without having the whole notice indexed. I
guess it produces also a smaller index volume too and maybe a faster
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
--- Comment #1 from Ere Maijala ---
I'd suggest something like allowing wildcards in the index mappings so that you
could index all the needed fields in the _all field using the index mappings.
This would make it possible to e.g.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Nick Clemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glask...@gmail.com,
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22258
Nick Clemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ere.maij...@helsinki.fi
--
31 matches
Mail list logo