2012/2/8 Robin Sheat
> Tomas Cohen Arazi schreef op wo 08-02-2012 om 12:42 [-0300]:
> > 1) The use of ENV vs. koha-conf.xml vs. DB/systempreferences to store
> > memcached configuration.
>
> My 2¢ here is that we should use ENV. The main logic behind this is that
> it means the only thing you can
Paul schreef op wo 08-02-2012 om 14:37 [-0500]:
> 0 Not damaged Not damaged
> 3 Normal wear Normal wear
> However, in both staff interface and OPAC, "normal wear" items are
> appearing as damaged
> I assume (maybe incorrectly) that the value of "damaged" is read by
> detail
Tomas Cohen Arazi schreef op wo 08-02-2012 om 12:42 [-0300]:
> 1) The use of ENV vs. koha-conf.xml vs. DB/systempreferences to store
> memcached configuration.
My 2¢ here is that we should use ENV. The main logic behind this is that
it means the only thing you can't cache is the ENV vars, which n
In our "Authorized values" > "Damaged", we have added a term "Normal wear"
to the Koha defaults 0, 1 and 2:
0 Not damaged Not damaged
1 Damaged Some damage noted
2 Unknown Condition not stated
3 Normal wear Normal wear
However, in both staff inter
Hi, I'm just starting a thread to discuss this topic so we make some
decisions and we can continue improving Koha in this aspect. As far as
I can remember there are a few issues with this:
1) The use of ENV vs. koha-conf.xml vs. DB/systempreferences to store
memcached configuration.
I introduced
