-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 18/07/2012 06:48, Mason James a écrit :
Paul, can you publish the databases somewhere. so they can be used
for general Koha testing
They already are, on contrib repo =
Hi koha-devel, and mainly Chris_c,
http://dashboard.koha-community.org/ is really an interesting tool, that
will, I hope, become more and more used !
I've some suggestions:
* The Last 5 sign-off is less important than Needs signoff and New
features recently pushed. It could be in 3rd place
*
On 18/07/2012 11:40, Paul Poulain wrote:
Hi koha-devel, and mainly Chris_c,
http://dashboard.koha-community.org/ is really an interesting tool, that
will, I hope, become more and more used !
I've some suggestions:
* The Last 5 sign-off is less important than Needs signoff and New
features
This question has come up in the last few IRC meetings, but we need a
broader consensus:
Should development of 3.4 be officially ended? If so, how should this
be handled? Discussion in today's IRC meeting brought up the question
of whether it should be killed or merely orphaned. I would
Greetings,
Should development of 3.4 be officially ended?
Yes. It was suggested that it was defacto-orphaned already in the meeting as
well.
If so, how should this be handled?
Discussion in today's IRC meeting brought up the question
of whether it should be killed or merely orphaned. I
Le 18/07/2012 17:41, Mark Tompsett a écrit :
Greetings,
Should development of 3.4 be officially ended?
Yes. It was suggested that it was defacto-orphaned already in the
meeting as well.
This is a combination, in that it is merely orphaned now (after the fact
-- April 22, 2012), but
Greetings,
[snip] I wrote:
This is a combination, in that it is merely orphaned now (after the fact
-- April 22, 2012), but officially killed April 22, 2013. The
differences lie mostly in the announcement and the fact that one is
recognized to be in use while no patches are done (orphaned),
Le 12/07/2012 10:53, Paul Poulain a écrit :
Hello koha-devel,
I have some points to rise about our release process.
OK, we spoke of this during our IRC meeting. I also spoke of this with
Jared, that applied as RM for 3.12 (he's not elected yet, but I suspect
he will be the only one fool enough
Paul, et. al.,
I just wanted to express my support for this plan on the mailing list.
What I/we plan to do:
* 2 months before the release (number N) =
- declare small feature freeze: only bugfixes and small/non-core
enhancement are pushed for the next release
- branch the release on
Owen,
- branch the release on git. master goes his way for N+1, major ENH
can be pushed here. N is still controlled by the RM, N-1 controlled by
the RMaint
I'm not sure I understand this aspect of it. The branching is to allow
enhancements to still be pushed somewhere while
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Nicole Engard neng...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
The voting closed at 3am EST this morning and the tallies are in. I
have shared the files (without names) on the Wiki:
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Kohacon2013
The final point totals from the voting
I've been struggling with
$ dselect --set-selections install_misc/ubuntu.packages
$ dselect install
pulling i386 packages and trying to break my poor amd64 12.04 PVM, and
started to dig on problems related to Ubuntu support and docs
problems.
The most bugs reported have to do with docs being
Tomas,
My vote is for the current LTS revisions only (lucid and precise, the
first being outdated for master i guess, not sure). Their 2-year
release cycle seems to be enough for having a fair recent version of
the required libs. So, this files might need being updated/deleted and
new ones
I'd also suggest the instructions, for precise at least, strongly recommend
using the koha-common packages. There is a ppa for stable and a daily build
of master for ubuntu.
Chris
On Jul 19, 2012 6:46 AM, Jared Camins-Esakov jcam...@cpbibliography.com
wrote:
Tomas,
My vote is for the current
On 19 July 2012 08:06, Paul pau...@aandc.org wrote:
At 03:35 PM 7/18/2012 -0300, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote:
I've been struggling with
I'd be happy to try and assist with this documentation. I struggled with
3.8 on our sandbox (maybe less than Tomas, as it's a i386) and will probably
Greetings,
[snip]
New LTSs are released every two years, but end-of-life
is after five years (e.g. current 12.04 LTS is valid until April 2017.)
The 10.04 server (Lucid) is valid until
April 2015, and the older 8.04 Heron server is still valid
until April 2013 and could probably be dropped
16 matches
Mail list logo
