Hi,
My librarian complains that when in cataloging and in particular when he
links a biblio marc record to an authority existing record,
he needs the order of the subfields copied from the authority to be
intact and according to the authority record!
For instance
When he wishes to link to
I’d like to put forward a motion for removal of the guideline that one
company shouldn’t sign-off on the same company's patches within the
community.
I think this is a good rule, and I think our current process has
proved that by showing that with many different points of view looking
at the
I don't want to weigh in on the overall discussion around these changes,
but I thinkOwen's point about a setting up a separate test instance to test
major features like his example of bug 6427 is a very good idea, and would
allow many people to test it thoroughly, in a more robust, almost live
I agree these are good ideas. We have done these many times, but the
follow-through just never really happens.
I guess I'm more pointing out we've (we've = koha-community) got a problem
with the current process. We have more patches than we have as a
collective volunteer time within the
