Re: [Koha-devel] Jesse Weaver (pianohacker) will be working with ByWater for the Summer. Special Request to join QAA team..

2013-04-05 Thread Marcel de Rooy
+1 from me too; the biggest qa team ever and hopefully the smallest queue :) Van: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org [koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org] namens Katrin Fischer [katrin.fischer...@web.de] Verzonden: vrijdag 5 april 2013

Re: [Koha-devel] BibLibre hires a student to work during summer for the community

2013-04-05 Thread Magnus Enger
On 4 April 2013 20:53, Chris Cormack ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz wrote: So writing WWW::Mechanize tests to test things functions also. I'd like to build up a set of tests that can simulate an hour in an average(ish) library, and have them running after any successful jenkins build. I can help

Re: [Koha-devel] Jesse Weaver will be working with ByWater for the Summer.

2013-04-05 Thread Paul Poulain
Le 05/04/2013 00:14, Brendan Gallagher a écrit : Jesse Weaver, the 54th committer to Koha, will be working with ByWater from May 15th to about August 15th of 2013. He will be dedicated to working only on Koha work, like signing off on patches and fixing bugs Galen, with 2 dev full time (1

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Quoc Uy
Nice question. I don't know, too. But really, the 3. has important meaning, i guess! Maybe nicole engard or chris and answer! Best regards! Nguyen Quoc Uy On 05.04.2013, at 14:00, koha-devel-requ...@lists.koha-community.org wrote: Send Koha-devel mailing list submissions to

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Chris Nighswonger
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Paul Poulain paul.poul...@biblibre.comwrote: What could/should we expect to decide to switch to 4.x ? IIRC this was discussed sometime back on irc/wiki/mailing list/somewhere and the prevailing thought was that 4.x would happen when the solr implementation was

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Paul Poulain
Le 05/04/2013 13:34, Kyle Hall a écrit : From what I've I've heard around the water cooler, we won't be switching to 4.x until there is some major change to the internal infrastructure of Koha ( like Solr support, or perhaps DBIx::Class support ). The switch from 2.x to 3.x was driven by a

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Paul Poulain
Le 05/04/2013 14:11, Chris Nighswonger a écrit : It seems that any major move forward would qualify for a major version increment, however. Something like DBIx, the completion of the move from C4:: to Koha::, the completion of the move from YUI to bootstrap, etc. In this case, we could have

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Paul
At 07:34 AM 4/5/2013 -0400, Kyle Hall wrote: From what I've I've heard around the water cooler, we won't be switching to 4.x until there is some major change to the internal infrastructure of Koha ( like Solr support, or perhaps DBIx::Class support ). I think if were to ditch the traditional

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Paul Poulain
Le 05/04/2013 15:26, Paul Poulain a écrit : So 12.0, 12.1, 12.2,... then 14.0,... Another positive aspect of this option : 12.0 IS a number. 3.12.0 isn't ;-) -- Paul POULAIN - BibLibre http://www.biblibre.com Free Open Source Softwares for libraries Koha, Drupal, Piwik, Jasper

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Kyle Hall
I think you have some good ideas here. It seems to me that support for each release drops off rather dramatically. Our oldest supported release is currently 3.8 which was first released about 1 year ago! Right now I believe a release is only supported as long as we have a maintainer willing to do

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread BWS Johnson
Salvete! You silly, silly man. Everyone knows that anything past nine isn#x27;t real maths. ;) xkcd.com#x2F;899#x2F; I still mostly don#x27;t care how things are numbered. I care far more that thongs operate how they ought to. Cheers,

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Nicole Engard
I'm not too pick about the numbering, as a trainer I have been saying that we'll roll to 4.0 when we get Solr since that's what was said at KohaCon and in IRC meetings (maybe on the mailing list too). I think a single number is certainly easier for the average person than our current 3.10.4 type

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Jared Camins-Esakov
I'm not too pick about the numbering, as a trainer I have been saying that we'll roll to 4.0 when we get Solr since that's what was said at KohaCon and in IRC meetings (maybe on the mailing list too). I think a single number is certainly easier for the average person than our current 3.10.4

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Nicole Engard
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote: Consequently, I'd be happy if we kept the 3.x series going indefinitely, or if we bumped up the major version number when it felt right, or if we dropped the 3. and called the fall release 13.0 or 14.0. Whatever gets

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Liz Rea
I too was looking forward to 3.14. I'm happy to change it after that. :P Yes, ok, it's a sentimental thing but... it's PI. COME ON. Liz On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Nicole Engard neng...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote:

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Christopher Nighswonger
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Liz Rea wizzy...@gmail.com wrote: I too was looking forward to 3.14. I'm happy to change it after that. :P Yes, ok, it's a sentimental thing but... it's PI. COME ON. So does that make for a potentially irrational release? Chris

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Mark Tompsett
From: Liz Rea Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 6:45 PM To: Nicole Engard Cc: Koha Devel Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering I too was looking forward to 3.14. I'm happy to change it after that. :P Yes, ok, it's a sentimental thing but... it's PI. COME ON. It’s a close approximation of

Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering

2013-04-05 Thread Chris Cormack
Means we never need to worry about increasing the major number again, just keep adding digits. :) Chris Christopher Nighswonger chris.nighswon...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Liz Rea wizzy...@gmail.com wrote: I too was looking forward to 3.14. I'm happy to change it