On 17 March 2015 at 11:06, Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com> wrote: > Hello devs, > > A (very) quick email to let you know I have submitted patches on > bug 13691 - Add some selenium scripts > and > bug 13849 - Introduce acceptance tests with cucumber > > I would like to start a discussion on these subjects: selenium, > cubumber, browser-based tests, acceptance tests, etc. > What are you opinions? Should we stuck to Test::WWW::Mechanize or it's > worth to have a look somewhere else? > > Useless ? Worth a try ? Very useful ?
I think integration/acceptance tests would be very, very useful. Unit tests at the level of individual subroutines are awesome, of course, but some automated way of telling if things are working on a higher level would definitely be a good thing. I have been a fan of Test::WWW::Mechanize, but with our increasing reliance on JS and AJAX, I think something that can work with those things too are a necessity. I don't have strong opinions on what tools we should use, though. Best regards, Magnus libriotech.no _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
