Yes, lots of patches, and
- it would be difficult to find a RM for 1 year,
- libraries would not be happy if they have to wait 1 year to see their
sponsored devs pushed in master,
- the update from 3.0 to 3.2 (2 years...) seems to be a very very bad
memory for lot of people (I think at that
Hi,
Not to nitpick, but won't numbering Koha with 4.x open possibilities
of confusion with that other prop. product with a similar sounding
name and version numbering?
just wondering aloud :)
cheers
--
Indranil Das Gupta
Phone : +91-98300-20971
Blog: http://indradg.randomink.org/blog
IRC
...@rijksmuseum.nl
To: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering
Message-ID:
809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA310E20641A@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cool discussion :)
Here is my
From: Marcel de Rooy m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
To: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering
Message-ID
Hello
Maybe you will not agree with me, but here is my *personal *opinion
about release rythm : 6 month between each major release seems quite a
short delay.
In France we have libraries using 3.10 (I think only my library for the
moment), 3.8, probably 3.6, 3.2 (with a lot of local changes).
At 04:07 PM 4/7/2013 -0400, Jared Camins-Esakov wrote:
But please do not jump from 3 to 14 !
Good point. I added the following proposal to the agenda for the next IRC
meeting:
When does the vote take place, and how does one join in? I've no
experience whatsoever with IRC, what's needed
At 04:07 PM 4/7/2013 -0400, Jared Camins-Esakov wrote:
But please do not jump from 3 to 14 !
Good point. I added the following proposal to the agenda for the next IRC
meeting:
When does the vote take place, and how does one join in? I've no
experience whatsoever with IRC, what's needed
http://koha-community.org/get-involved/irc/ may be the resource you are
looking for.
Cheers,
Liz Rea
On 08/04/13 10:07, Paul wrote:
At 04:07 PM 4/7/2013 -0400, Jared Camins-Esakov wrote:
But please do not jump from 3 to 14 !
Good point. I added the following proposal to the agenda for
Thank you for Katrin Chris for your answers ( I also read some
comments on irc...)
You convinced me, 1 year release would be a bad idea ;-)
Mathieu
Le 07/04/2013 10:48, Katrin Fischer a écrit :
Hi Mathieu,
you are right in that updating every half year is a lot of work, but the
good thing
Galen Charlton schreef op vr 05-04-2013 om 11:28 [-0700]:
Really just two things:
first, that they increase from version to version.
I reserve the right to get grumpy if they don't map cleanly into the
debian versioning scheme.
Second, that we
don't spend a great deal of time discussing
+
From: Marcel de Rooy m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
To: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering
Message-ID:
809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA310E20641A@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra
Content-Type: text/plain; charset
Le 05/04/2013 20:28, Galen Charlton a écrit :
I don't ask much of version number schemes. Really just two things:
first, that they increase from version to version. Second, that we
don't spend a great deal of time discussing them. :)
OK, I propose to open a poll to have as many ppl opinion as
Paul,
OK, I propose to open a poll to have as many ppl opinion as possible.
The most interested ppl being users/libraries themselves !
Are you seriously proposing we waste MORE time on this? As everyone
involved in this discussion has expressed a willingness to start versioning
Koha with whole
At 12:15 AM 4/7/2013 +0200, Paul Poulain wrote:
[snip]
The poll would have the following options :
* keep 3. forever
* keep the 3. until a major functional change is made, like introducing
a new search engine. The numbering change is decided by the Release Manager.
* drop the 3. and use 14.0,
Paul pau...@aandc.org wrote:
At 12:15 AM 4/7/2013 +0200, Paul Poulain wrote:
[snip]
The poll would have the following options :
* keep 3. forever
* keep the 3. until a major functional change is made, like
introducing
a new search engine. The numbering change is decided by the Release
)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 09:40:22 +0200
From: Paul Poulain paul.poul...@biblibre.com
To: Koha Devel Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering
Message-ID: 515e7fe6.5030...@biblibre.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello koha
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Paul Poulain paul.poul...@biblibre.comwrote:
What could/should we expect to decide to switch to 4.x ?
IIRC this was discussed sometime back on irc/wiki/mailing list/somewhere
and the prevailing thought was that 4.x would happen when the solr
implementation was
Le 05/04/2013 13:34, Kyle Hall a écrit :
From what I've I've heard around the water cooler, we won't be switching
to 4.x until there is some major change to the internal infrastructure
of Koha ( like Solr support, or perhaps DBIx::Class support ).
The switch from 2.x to 3.x was driven by a
Le 05/04/2013 14:11, Chris Nighswonger a écrit :
It seems that any major move forward would qualify for a major version
increment, however. Something like DBIx, the completion of the move from
C4:: to Koha::, the completion of the move from YUI to bootstrap, etc.
In this case, we could have
At 07:34 AM 4/5/2013 -0400, Kyle Hall wrote:
From what I've I've heard around the water cooler, we won't be switching to
4.x until there is some major change to the internal infrastructure of Koha
( like Solr support, or perhaps DBIx::Class support ).
I think if were to ditch the traditional
Le 05/04/2013 15:26, Paul Poulain a écrit :
So 12.0, 12.1, 12.2,... then 14.0,...
Another positive aspect of this option : 12.0 IS a number.
3.12.0 isn't ;-)
--
Paul POULAIN - BibLibre
http://www.biblibre.com
Free Open Source Softwares for libraries
Koha, Drupal, Piwik, Jasper
I think you have some good ideas here. It seems to me that support for each
release drops off rather dramatically. Our oldest supported release is
currently 3.8 which was first released about 1 year ago!
Right now I believe a release is only supported as long as we have a
maintainer willing to do
Salvete!
You silly, silly man. Everyone knows that anything past nine isn#x27;t
real maths. ;)
xkcd.com#x2F;899#x2F;
I still mostly don#x27;t care how things are numbered. I care far more
that thongs operate how they ought to.
Cheers,
I'm not too pick about the numbering, as a trainer I have been saying that
we'll roll to 4.0 when we get Solr since that's what was said at KohaCon
and in IRC meetings (maybe on the mailing list too). I think a single
number is certainly easier for the average person than our current 3.10.4
type
I'm not too pick about the numbering, as a trainer I have been saying that
we'll roll to 4.0 when we get Solr since that's what was said at KohaCon
and in IRC meetings (maybe on the mailing list too). I think a single
number is certainly easier for the average person than our current 3.10.4
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote:
Consequently, I'd be happy if we kept the 3.x series going
indefinitely, or if we bumped up the major version number when it felt
right, or if we dropped the 3. and called the fall release 13.0 or
14.0.
Whatever gets
I too was looking forward to 3.14. I'm happy to change it after that.
:P
Yes, ok, it's a sentimental thing but... it's PI. COME ON.
Liz
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Nicole Engard neng...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Liz Rea wizzy...@gmail.com wrote:
I too was looking forward to 3.14. I'm happy to change it after that.
:P
Yes, ok, it's a sentimental thing but... it's PI. COME ON.
So does that make for a potentially irrational release?
Chris
From: Liz Rea
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 6:45 PM
To: Nicole Engard
Cc: Koha Devel
Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Koha numbering
I too was looking forward to 3.14. I'm happy to change it after that.
:P
Yes, ok, it's a sentimental thing but... it's PI. COME ON.
It’s a close approximation of pi
Means we never need to worry about increasing the major number again, just keep
adding digits.
:)
Chris
Christopher Nighswonger chris.nighswon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Liz Rea wizzy...@gmail.com wrote:
I too was looking forward to 3.14. I'm happy to change it
30 matches
Mail list logo
