2009/6/4 Joe Atzberger
> Kohackers --
>
> I want to mention this because I've seen a lot of recent patches still
> using the old style of code calling $sth->finish() explicitly. I know a lot
> of the codebase still does this internally, but for Koha such usage is
> almost always wrong.
>
>
One w
Jesse a écrit :
> I've wondered about this myself, since Perl, being a dynamic language,
> should have some sort of destructor support.
>
> Thanks for looking into this, I'll try to avoid it in the future.
Hi Jesse,
how is your MUA configured ? (and what MUA do you use?) it's a
"nighmare" to rea
2009/6/4 Joe Atzberger
> Kohackers --
>
> I want to mention this because I've seen a lot of recent patches still
> using the old style of code calling $sth->finish() explicitly. I know a lot
> of the codebase still does this internally, but for Koha such usage is
> almost always wrong.
>
> If th
Kohackers --
I want to mention this because I've seen a lot of recent patches still using
the old style of code calling $sth->finish() explicitly. I know a lot of
the codebase still does this internally, but for Koha such usage is almost
always wrong.
If this were just my personal contention, I