On Apr 5, 2007, at 9:28 PM, Ralph Shumaker wrote:
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote:
a) replace our entire list management system with something that
does better obfuscation in the web archives.
I know next to nothing about the list management system. Bearing
that in mind, couldn't the
The mailing list are a public forum.
Let that sink in for a moment.
As such, Helge should have been more careful, and not (presumably)
put an email address in the Subject: header of an email sent to a
mailing list. I can't seem to find the email in question. When was
it sent? What
On Apr 5, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote:
As such, Helge should have been more careful, and not (presumably)
put an email address in the Subject: header of an email sent to a
mailing list. I can't seem to find the email in question. When
was it sent? What was the
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote:
The mailing list are a public forum.
Let that sink in for a moment.
As such, Helge should have been more careful, and not (presumably) put
an email address in the Subject: header of an email sent to a mailing
list. I can't seem to find the email in question.
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote:
The mailing list are a public forum.
Let that sink in for a moment.
As such, Helge should have been more careful, and not (presumably) put
an email address in the Subject: header of an email sent to a mailing
list. I can't seem to find the email in
Gregory K.Ruiz-Ade wrote:
..
I still haven't found the message (dated today, not the original thread)
which you say included me in the recipients. To be clear, if someone
can cough up the Message-ID for today's message, not the original
thread, that'd be great.
Todays message was direct, NOT
James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
..
I can envision an argument that diddling email-addresses within the body
might have unforseen (undesirable) consequences, but..
Looking at the archive of todays messages shows that email addresses
within body text *do get obfuscated*.
But it looks like it didn't
James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
Hmmm, maybe it's already implemented? I think I'll add to the subject
line of this email -- as a test message.
http://www.kernel-panic.org/pipermail/kplug-steer/2007-April/003223.html
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN
HTML
HEAD
TITLE Helge has
Gus Wirth wrote:
..
Although you are correct in that the lists are a public forum, it is
evident that we do try to do some minimal obfuscation to protect e-mail
addresses. Evidently, the list manager doesn't look in the subject line
since that's not an obvious place to look.
That's the main
On Apr 5, 2007, at 3:27 PM, James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
Helge is evidently a man's name. I was thinking of Helga, I suppose.
Bah, I made that mistake too. We're all stupid americans, anyway, so
he shouldn't have expected any better.
:D
Gregory
--
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo