Is that just with KR's or in general?
Tony King
Brisbane Australia
On 31 March 2010 15:44, phillip matheson wrote:
> In Australia, CASA ( Air Safety Dept) do NOT allow the use of the rear 2
> inches of the C of G for safety concerns.
>
> Phil Matheson
> SAAA Ch 20
>
In Australia, CASA ( Air Safety Dept) do NOT allow the use of the rear 2
inches of the C of G for safety concerns.
Phil Matheson
SAAA Ch 20
www.phils...@50megs.com
AMEN, Virg
R. Human wrote:
>> The KR-2 is too short for a tail wheel. Maybe
> Some of ya'll need to find a better tailwheel instructor!
>
> Rick Human
> N202RH
> Houston, Tx
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at
Karl, I just clicked on the link in your email and the website opened right
away .
Patrick Driscoll
Saint Paul, MN
patric...@usfamily.net
If you can read this, Thank a teacher
If you are reading this in English, thank a veteran
>The KR-2 is too short for a tail wheel. Maybe the
2-S is OK once you're used to it but the shorter "2" is no fun at all with a
tail wheel.<
All I can say to this is HORSE HOCKEY! I have a straight short body 2 with
fixed conventional gear and love the way it handles on the ground and in the
air.
I made my first five flights in my KR-2 as a tail dragger on a long paved
and wide runway. The last landing was hard enough to bend the left main gear
and send the wheel partially into the stub wing. It also scraped the right
wing tip on the trailing edge. There were three fire engines that showed
All,
Should have asked this as well. If capstrip is unsuitable for the wing
spars is it also unsuitable for the spars used in the horizontal and vertical
stabilizers? If so, not a problem as I will calculate width needed including
kerf loss, order 5/8" spar stock, and rip them myself.
Hello Netter's,
We are registered and will have a booth for the KR's near the pond behind
Hangar "D" this year at Sun n Fun. Any and all interested in the KR are
more than welcome to stop by and say hi. We will have a few sets of plans
available for sale for those who have been on the fence
All,
Still trying to get my Aircraft Spruce wood order right and I have a few
questions. Is capstrip suitable for use as spar and longeron material? In their
online catalog Aircraft Spruce states that their capstrip stock is
"non-structural". Aren't spars considered structural?
The
Karl,
It opened fine for me - but it IS a large pdf file - something like 475
pages long - so you may need some patience to wait for it to load.
Ed J.
.
- Original Message -
From: "Karl"
To: "KRnet "
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 11:29 AM
Daniel,
Depending on how large the area is to repair, it might be easier to form the
trailing edge with thickened epoxy (flox) alone, using a straight edge, but
if you use shaped aluminum, you could drill a bunch of little holes in the
aluminum and epoxy (flox) the aluminum to the trailing
Karl wrote:
> I have tried to open this link a few times with no luck. Does any have
> better luck than I do?
It works for me. It's a fairly large file though (63M), so if your internet
connection is slow, I can see how it might time out before the download is
finished. It's a funny looking
Hi.
I have tried to open this link a few times with no luck. Does any have
better luck than I do?
Thanks
Karl
-Original Message-
Don't forget that Mark Lougheed has already scanned the early ones (with
permission from Ernie Koppe, the originator of the newsletter and editor
at that
I've been thinking about my trailing edge delamination issue.
As all y'all know, the trailing edge (per plans) is formed when the upper and
lower surfaces are joined together at a point, and then trimmed to shape.
Since my trailing edges are now coming apart at the corners (granted it's an
After a hard landing some years ago, my 1983 KR2 became a hangar queen for many
years, before I acquired it. There is some delamination here
and there, and some gaps exposed foam at the stub wings and outboard wing
roots. Naturally I want to fix all that. Broken parts can always be rebuilt,
At 07:33 AM 3/30/2010, you wrote:
>What effect if any does the engine have on flying a KR-2 with 2 people? You
>would think that a larger engine like an 0-200 would bring the CG forward more
>as opposed to an Volkswagon 1853.
>How does the wing design effect the flying characteristics with 2
What effect if any does the engine have on flying a KR-2 with 2 people? You
would think that a larger engine like an 0-200 would bring the CG forward more
as opposed to an Volkswagon 1853.
How does the wing design effect the flying characteristics with 2 people? The
stock KR-2 wing vs. Diehl
> #$#$#$#$#$#$#$##$#$#$#$#$#$#$#$#
>
> To the net.
>
> Mike was 100% correct. Haveing 3 pointed my taildragger 3 time now, you
> have to come down a little nose down, and wheel land. And yes put some
> down in after you land, classic wheel landing stuff. He was right to say
> you can have
18 matches
Mail list logo