At 08:59 PM 12/26/2010, you wrote:
>This article explains
>
>http://www.kr2seafury.com/resources/SA_1979_landing_gear.pdf
+
Thanks for the post. It was 15 to 20 degrees, not 25 degrees.
Larry Flesner
This article explains
http://www.kr2seafury.com/resources/SA_1979_landing_gear.pdf
> If I remember correctly,Tony Bingelis recommends the
> contact point
> for the main gear(on a conventional gear aircraft) as being
> at a 15
> to 25 degree angle forward of the aircraft C.G. in a level
>
>
At 06:20 PM 12/25/2010, you wrote:
>Whilst focussing on A/C 1 at the moment I need to plan what to do with #2.
>My instinct is to return the tail group to standard, deal with the c.g.
>issue and move the wheels forward . comments? Also, what is the best way
>to move the wheels ... should I
I wrote:
>>If I open the canopy (forward) with no fuel and any kind of
weight on the cowling or the floor (where my laptop sits), it will fall on
it's nose if I have it jacked up into a level position as a starting point.
So that may not be the end of the world for your KRs.<<
Now that I think
Martin Pearce wrote:
>>Doing a W & B I found both to be very similar in weight. A/c #1 (neither
>>yet
have an Au rego) appears to be in good balance and has a small tail down
force when empty in the level attitude. A/C 2 appears to have an aft CG
situation but wants to tip on its nose when
I have two Kr2 a/c in my garage, recently imported from Canada, one for me
and one for one of my good flying friends.
Doing a W & B I found both to be very similar in weight. A/c #1 (neither yet
have an Au rego) appears to be in good balance and has a small tail down
force when empty in the
6 matches
Mail list logo
