?
?
>I recently bought a couple of gear legs that are fiberglass and for
>a Grumman Should I make them narrower or thinner
>Mark W.
+
Seeing no replies to your question I'll offer my "opinion". If you
are
> Mine are a bit softer than many others, but that doesn't seem to
> affect them adversely. Soft gear makes for smooth landings. :o)
>Like Larry, I think I would taper them to match the contour of the
>Diehl gear, give them a wrap with glass to finish and call it close
>enough. -Jeff Scott
Mark,
I used the same Grumman gear leg blanks you describe. I ran them through my
wood power planer to 3/4 inch thickness and tapered with a sweep back to get
20 inches for the wheel axil from the leading edge of the stub wing for the
stock KR-2. The amount of sweep will depend on tail
At 06:33 PM 5/8/2016, you wrote:
>I recently bought a couple of gear legs that are fiberglass and for
>a Grumman Should I make them narrower or thinner
>Mark W.
+
Seeing no replies to your question I'll
Network from my Samsung Galaxy S?4
Original message
From: Mark Wegmet via KRnet
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 05/08/2016 6:33 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: 'KRnet'
Cc: Mark Wegmet
Subject: KR> Landing gear question
I recently bought a couple of gear legs that are fibergl
I recently bought a couple of gear legs that are fiberglass and for a Grumman
which have indicated that they will support a 2200 to 2400 pound aircraft.
Obviously a KR as about 2/3's to 1/2's that. Should I make them narrower or
thinner (i.e., split them to reduce the thickness by about 50%)
6 matches
Mail list logo
