KR> IFR at night

2008-12-28 Thread Andy Mckevitz
Whoa there horsey!  I merely mentioned IFR at night as to describe my desire 
for the planes capability.  I will most likely never do this.  After all, a 
twin comanche that flies daily will still lose an engine after SIX A and 3 
IA's inspect it and will still end up being consumed by Idaho Rocky Mountains 
at night!  I will do one, or the other.  I understand complacency kills - if 
you're not current, you have no business flying IFR.  

That being said, I'd definitely abide by over water rules [away from safe glide 
distance if ever the case... prob not since Avemco said no to comprehensive 
insurance for these planes] by having a liferaft.  Considering all that can go 
wrong, I don't know if I'll fly w/out a parachute again, and in the KR case, 
possibly a ballistic chute, but thats debatable.  Need to keep within reason, 
and safety. 

Again, safety first, no IFR at night in a thunderstorm - for anybody!

and the first step, log pitts time.  I hear thats a good thing to deal with 
this short-coupled taildragger.

that must have been some ride in that DC-3.

Andy  <--- would love to fly back to base after sunset






KR> IFR practice

2008-10-12 Thread brokerpi...@bellsouth.net
Netters
ALL US private pilots are required to receive a minimum of 3 hours of 
Instrument instruction, under simulated or actual conditions from an instructor 
prior to taking his checkride, and has to be able to demonstrate reasonable 
aircraft control of level flight, turns to a heading, shallow climbs and 
shallow descents, as per the new/updated Practical Test Standards put out by 
the FAA. Greater emphasis has been placed on this proficiency both in the 
checkrides and BFR checks due to the rise in the last few years of 
no-instrument rated pilots accidentally blundering into IMC.  IF you receive 
the proper training you should have a good start on the skills necessary to 
remain safe if the accident occurs.  And as another post mentioned proper 
pre-flight prep and planning after the checkride is complete.

Colin Rainey
N96TA
CFI, CFII, MEI





KR> IFR

2008-10-12 Thread Mark Jones
Right now I am socked in with a 500' ceiling. Not looking good. I do not
know when I can depart yet.

Mark Jones (N886MJ)
Wales, WI  USA
E-mail me at flyk...@wi.rr.com
Visit my KR-2S CorvAIRCRAFT web site at
http://mywebpage.netscape.com/n886mj






KR> IFR

2008-10-12 Thread Dan Heath
Leavin the house in about 25 min.  Clear skys here. I bet you will get out
before noon.

See you in Mt. Vernon - 2005 - KR Gathering
See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics 
There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for building
has expired.
Daniel R. Heath - Columbia, SC
---Original Message---

From: Mark Jones
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 09/08/05 07:24:30
To: KR Net
Subject: KR> IFR

Right now I am socked in with a 500' ceiling. Not looking good. I do not
know when I can depart yet.

Mark Jones (N886MJ)
Wales, WI  USA
E-mail me at flyk...@wi.rr.com
Visit my KR-2S CorvAIRCRAFT web site at
http://mywebpage.netscape.com/n886mj




___
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html



KR> IFR

2008-10-12 Thread Bob Glidden
Ya there's some low lying fog here,I'm going to delay my departure a few 
minutes.I'll have a extra cup of coffee with the farmers.Everyone flying in 
or driving for that matter,be careful and get there when you can.

Bob Glidden
Eminence,Indiana
KR2S N181FW (building)
Corvair 110
glid...@ccrtc.com
- Original Message - 
From: "Mark Jones" <flyk...@wi.rr.com>
To: "KR Net" <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 6:27 AM
Subject: KR> IFR


> Right now I am socked in with a 500' ceiling. Not looking good. I do not
> know when I can depart yet.
>
> Mark Jones (N886MJ)
> Wales, WI  USA
> E-mail me at flyk...@wi.rr.com
> Visit my KR-2S CorvAIRCRAFT web site at
> http://mywebpage.netscape.com/n886mj
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> 




KR> IFR KR

2008-10-12 Thread larry flesner
. Also, would it be possible to have an
>IFR capable KR-2? Thanks again.
>
>Derek Hudeck


Anythings possible but the general census is the KR is not
a good IFR platform.  If you need IFR capabilities you probably
ought to look at something other than the KR.

Larry Flesner





KR> IFR deliberate

2008-10-12 Thread Colin & Bev Rainey
I agree that there are acceptable circumstances where the KR is a good platform 
for IFR conditions, the same as there are some that apply to a C152.  I would 
not take a C152 into what Instrument Pilots know as hard IMC, but the 
flexibility to be able to descend through a cloud layer like Marty & Jim got 
stuck on top of going to one of the Gatherings, or get out or in when it is low 
visibility, but margins are not down to minimums that would require a more 
stable platform, yes I think it would be fine.  It all has to do with your 
skill level and your proficiency.  There are alot of situations that I 
personally would not fly in unless I had a twin, but that is a personal 
judgement based on experience and my limitations.  To me there is a huge 
difference between flying in bad weather IMC and flying in marginal or IFR 
visibility conditions.  We are having alot of fires down here right now, and 
without warning and area can get really close to being IFR as far as flight 
visiblity is concerned, but does not present the same type of hazards as the 
afternoon thunderstorms do.  I eventually want the flexibility to come home in 
the smoke and land safely.  That is the kind of instrument work/flying I am 
talking about, not getting into the clouds for hours at a time like I do now 
with 172s and twins.  Sometimes I wonder about using 172s, but that is another 
story

Colin & Bev Rainey
KR2(td) N96TA
Sanford, FL
crain...@cfl.rr.com
http://kr-builder.org/Colin/index.html


KR>KR-IFR

2008-10-12 Thread aviationm...@aol.com
In the early years of flying my KR there were times that I wished I had more 
instruments.  Remember that the design goal of the KR was to keep it light 
and fly fast.  I tried to do that initially and just kept wishing for more 
equipment.  My first wish came while crossing Lake Michigan enroute to 
Oshkosh.  How did I know that on a cloudless day, the water and the sky are 
the same color, and me and my KR with no AH.  I nearly went blind trying to 
keep that sun ball in the same spot on the cowling for the 17 minutes that I 
was out of sight of land.  The second time I made that wish was while taking 
a "Special" to get out of my home base in light  broken cloud cover, but 
still IFR.  The gap in the clouds that I thought I could follow just closed 
in on me and again there I was with only a turn and bank to keep the wings 
level.  And there have been other wishes as well.  I said all this so that 
those who want to scold and flame me can do so and also to say the more 
equipment you have the better your chances for survival, if for some reason 
you can't see.
N110LR now has a fairly complete panel.  In that I have AH, DG, T, VSI.  I 
have not tested the plane with the third gyro and hope that my 11 venturi 
will turn all of them.  To help the venturi, it is placed behind the right 
exhaust stack that helps it spin the gyro's prior to rotation.  
The low and slow airplanes that most say don't need all that equipment, 
usually cant fly at the same speed as a well engined KR can and the faster 
you cover real-estate, the more situational awareness you need.  

Orma aka AviationMech
KR-2 N110LR
1984 to Present
www.members.aol.com/aviationmech


KR>KR-IFR

2008-10-12 Thread Dan Heath
 RE:  To help the Venturi, it is placed behind the right 
exhaust stack that helps it spin the gyro's prior to rotation. 


Did you have to use an anti-backfire valve or just put it behind the
exhaust?

N64KR

Daniel R. Heath - Columbia, SC

da...@kr-builder.org

See you in Red Oak - 2003

See our KR at http://KR-Builder.org - Click on the pic
See our EAA Chapter 242 at http://EAA242.org



KR>KR-IFR

2008-10-12 Thread aviationm...@aol.com
In a message dated 4/26/2003 8:04:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
da...@alltel.net writes:

> Just put it behind the
> exhaust?
> 

Just in line with the exiting gas flow
Orma AKA AviationMech
KR-2 N110LR
1984 to Present
www.members.aol.com/aviationmech


KR>IFR in a KR?

2008-10-12 Thread bii...@aol.com
Just say NO !!  Unless u have a Cont 0200 with a real live vacuum system!  I 
have lost 5 engines and 2 of them were in night IFR conditions...believe me, 
it will increase your laundry bill immediately !  Don't do it guys!