Re: KR> home-brew thermocouples...for cheap!

2017-06-13 Thread brian.kraut--- via KRnet
Can you send the link to the wire you used.  I assume you twisted the
ends and then just melted a tiny blob on the end with no rod, correct?



Brian Kraut
904-536-1780
br...@eamanuacturing.com



 Original Message 
Subject: KR> home-brew thermocouples...for cheap!
From: Mark Langford via KRnet 
Date: Thu, June 08, 2017 6:46 pm
To: KRnet 
Cc: Mark Langford 

NetHeads,

I finally got my Revmaster heads last week, and have installed them and 
have put five hours on the engine so far. With new-found compression 
and big-valve heads, it's back to the ~170mph top speed and nice climb 
rate it had after the first rebuild.

But the Revmaster heads come with 12mm spark plugs, and at $35 each, I 
really didn't want to shell out $140 for four CHT probes, so I bought 
some K-type thermocouple wire for $9.50 off ebay (free shipping), 
12mm-#8 ring terminals for $0.55 each from Digikey, and built all four 
CHT probes for $18. Having seen thermocouple welders on youtube, I used 
my TIG welder set on 10A (the lowest setting) and just barely struck an 
arc with the pedal to weld the twisted thermocouple wires together in 
about 1.5 seconds, crimped the thermocouple to the ring terminal, and 
double heat shrank the terminal unions, with some superglue added 
underneath the shrink tube for good measure. Now I have home-brewed 
custom thermocouples for cheap, that are exactly the right length for 
each spark plug. And the fact that some are as much as 20% longer made 
no measurable difference. I tested all four (plus a spare OAT sensor 
and a Fluke temp probe) and they match within .6 degree F of each other 
using a six channel Omega tester at room temperature, so I'd call them 
"close enough for KR work"!

Something else I learned was the effect of tinning the instrument end of

the thermocouple wire. My thermocouple wire is stranded, so when I plug 
into the little slots on the tester the strands separate and make a 
mess. [And yes, know there's a connector for that job.] So I wondered 
what the accuracy difference would be if I tinned the end of the 
thermocouple wires with some solder. The answer, despite what I've read 
over the years, was "no measurable difference at all", at least not at 
ambient temperature. I flew the plane today, and cylinder head temps 
were amazingly uniform for a change. Of course a new pair of Revmaster 
heads didn't hurt either.

So neither length nor material compatibility at the connections make 
enough difference to accurately measure, and the difference may just be 
the way I welded them or some other tiny factor. And given the low 
accuracy required for CHT duty, the tiny differences in accuracy are "in

the noise" anyway. So there's another thing I can quit fretting over, 
and so can you. See enclosed photo...

-- 
Mark Langford
m...@n56ml.com
http://www.n56ml.com

___
Search the KRnet Archives at
https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to
change options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> home-brew thermocouples...for cheap!

2017-06-09 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet


On 6/9/2017 7:44 AM, Chris Kinnaman via KRnet wrote:

Then you would be testing your oven's thermostat. Depending on
elevation, boiling water will be pretty close to 100C no matter
what. But you're right, factory thermocouples probably get tested
maybe 1 out of 100.


Yep, I understand that water is better for testing actual accuracy, but 
accuracy isn't nearly as important as them all reading the same value at 
the same temperature (in my CHT application) so I can pick out a 
cylinder that's higher or lower than the rest, or use the info to 
optimize cooling through baffling tweaks.  When I tested these four at 
ambient, I also used a "factory" Fluke K thermocouple that came with my 
Fluke 52 Thermometer, and I have several others, so those would have 
been used in the oven as "reference" thermocouples to verify accuracy. 
Given that these are now hooked to my flaky iEFIS, all bets regarding 
accuracy are off anyway


Mark Langford
m...@n56ml.com
http://www.n56ml.com


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> home-brew thermocouples...for cheap!

2017-06-09 Thread louis lanie via KRnet
How are the Revmaster heads Cht  doing 
I had already ordered heads before I saw your review to replace my cracked 
ones
Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:46 AM, Chris Kinnaman via KRnet  
> wrote:
> 
> Then you would be testing your oven's thermostat. Depending on elevation, 
> boiling water will be pretty close to 100C no matter what. But you're right, 
> factory thermocouples probably get tested maybe 1 out of 100.
> 
>> On 6/9/2017 5:33 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote:
>> Chris Kinnaman wrote:
>> 
>> >>The only thing I would have done different would be testing them in 
>> >>boiling water as well as ambient.<<
>> 
>> I thought about that, but clamping them all together and putting them in a 
>> preheated oven and then switching if off to let oven temps stabilize would 
>> have been even better, but it was late, and I wanted to fly early the next 
>> day. Even the test I gave them is probably more than "factory" thermocouples 
>> get before they reach the end user, so I'm happy enough with them...
>> 
>> Mark Langford
>> m...@n56ml.com
>> http://www.n56ml.com
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Search the KRnet Archives at 
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
>> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
>> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
>> options.
>> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Search the KRnet Archives at 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> home-brew thermocouples...for cheap!

2017-06-09 Thread Chris Kinnaman via KRnet
Then you would be testing your oven's thermostat. Depending on 
elevation, boiling water will be pretty close to 100C no matter what. 
But you're right, factory thermocouples probably get tested maybe 1 out 
of 100.


On 6/9/2017 5:33 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote:

Chris Kinnaman wrote:

 >>The only thing I would have done different would be testing them in 
boiling water as well as ambient.<<


I thought about that, but clamping them all together and putting them 
in a preheated oven and then switching if off to let oven temps 
stabilize would have been even better, but it was late, and I wanted 
to fly early the next day. Even the test I gave them is probably more 
than "factory" thermocouples get before they reach the end user, so 
I'm happy enough with them...


Mark Langford
m...@n56ml.com
http://www.n56ml.com


___
Search the KRnet Archives at 
https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.

Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to 
change options.

To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org





___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> home-brew thermocouples...for cheap!

2017-06-09 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet

Chris Kinnaman wrote:

 >>The only thing I would have done different would be testing them in 
boiling water as well as ambient.<<


I thought about that, but clamping them all together and putting them in 
a preheated oven and then switching if off to let oven temps stabilize 
would have been even better, but it was late, and I wanted to fly early 
the next day. Even the test I gave them is probably more than "factory" 
thermocouples get before they reach the end user, so I'm happy enough 
with them...


Mark Langford
m...@n56ml.com
http://www.n56ml.com


___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> home-brew thermocouples...for cheap!

2017-06-09 Thread Chris Kinnaman via KRnet
Thanks, Mark. Years ago I used to make thermocouple probes and fixtures 
similar to this for taking heat rise profiles & calibrating various 
pieces of composite curing equipment around the plant. The only thing I 
would have done different would be testing them in boiling water as well 
as ambient. I got similar results - nothing seemed to be critical in the 
manner of construction or anything else that had a major effect on 
accuracy. I'm sure if I was going for a finer degree of accuracy I could 
have found that some of my probes were worse than others. Looking for a 
range rather than a pinpoint helped - which is what we're doing 
measuring CHT.


Chris K.

On 6/8/2017 7:46 PM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote:


But the Revmaster heads come with 12mm spark plugs, and at $35 each, I 
really didn't want to shell out $140 for four CHT probes, so I bought 
some K-type thermocouple wire for $9.50 off ebay (free shipping), 
12mm-#8 ring terminals for $0.55 each from Digikey, and built all four 
CHT probes for $18. 



___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org


Re: KR> home-brew thermocouples...for cheap!

2017-06-08 Thread Luis Claudio via KRnet
Awesome report and final product. I am ordering the heads for my Revmaster this 
week and now I have a game plan for the CHT wires. Thanks Mark
Luis R ClaudioDallas, Texas KR2S still 6 months out on a running 
engine/airplane 

On Thursday, June 8, 2017 8:48 PM, Mark Langford via KRnet 
 wrote:
 

 NetHeads,

I finally got my Revmaster heads last week, and have installed them and 
have put five hours on the engine so far.  With new-found compression 
and big-valve heads, it's back to the ~170mph top speed and nice climb 
rate it had after the first rebuild.

But the Revmaster heads come with 12mm spark plugs, and at $35 each, I 
really didn't want to shell out $140 for four CHT probes, so I bought 
some K-type thermocouple wire for $9.50 off ebay (free shipping), 
12mm-#8 ring terminals for $0.55 each from Digikey, and built all four 
CHT probes for $18.  Having seen thermocouple welders on youtube, I used 
my TIG welder set on 10A (the lowest setting) and just barely struck an 
arc with the pedal to weld the twisted thermocouple wires together in 
about 1.5 seconds, crimped the thermocouple to the ring terminal,  and 
double heat shrank the terminal unions, with some superglue added 
underneath the shrink tube for good measure.  Now I have home-brewed 
custom thermocouples for cheap, that are exactly the right length for 
each spark plug.  And the fact that some are as much as 20% longer made 
no measurable difference.  I tested all four (plus a spare OAT sensor 
and a Fluke temp probe) and they match within .6 degree F of each other 
using a six channel Omega tester at room temperature, so I'd call them 
"close enough for KR work"!

Something else I learned was the effect of tinning the instrument end of 
the thermocouple wire.  My thermocouple wire is stranded, so when I plug 
into the little slots on the tester the strands separate and make a 
mess.  [And yes, know there's a connector for that job.]  So I wondered 
what the accuracy difference would be if I tinned the end of the 
thermocouple wires with some solder.  The answer, despite what I've read 
over the years, was "no measurable difference at all", at least not at 
ambient temperature.  I flew the plane today, and cylinder head temps 
were amazingly uniform for a change.  Of course a new pair of Revmaster 
heads didn't hurt either.

So neither length nor material compatibility at the connections make 
enough difference to accurately measure, and the difference may just be 
the way I welded them or some other tiny factor. And given the low 
accuracy required for CHT duty, the tiny differences in accuracy are "in 
the noise" anyway.  So there's another thing I can quit fretting over, 
and so can you.  See enclosed photo...

-- 
Mark Langford
m...@n56ml.com
http://www.n56ml.com

___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

   
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org