>With Solaris, is there a way to specify the set of symbols that you want
>to be visible from the library or are all symbols that need to be
>shared between modules within the library visible no matter what?
Yes; this is done through linker mapfiles.
For a (not that) typical example see usr/src
>On 10/30/06, Roland Mainz wrote:
>> Attached is a small patch ("ksh93_libcmd_killglobalvars001.diff.txt")
>> for ast-ksh.2006-09-12 which significantly reduces the size of the
>> global variables in libcmd
>Why do you think the global variable size needs to be reduced? Is
>there anything especia
On 10/30/06, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Attached is a small patch ("ksh93_libcmd_killglobalvars001.diff.txt")
> for ast-ksh.2006-09-12 which significantly reduces the size of the
> global variables in libcmd
Why do you think the global variable size needs to be reduced? Is
there anything especially bad
Subject: Re: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] Patch to remove some gloval vars
in libcmd...
> But there's a bigger issue: any variable in a program
> will be mapped to the libcmd variable of the same name, so
> in essence libcmd steals a large chunk of user namespace a
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:46:45 +0100 Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
> >On 10/30/06, Roland Mainz wrote:
> >> Attached is a small patch ("ksh93_libcmd_killglobalvars001.diff.txt")
> >> for ast-ksh.2006-09-12 which significantly reduces the size of the
> >> global variables in libcmd
> >Why do you thin
Hi!
Attached is a small patch ("ksh93_libcmd_killglobalvars001.diff.txt")
for ast-ksh.2006-09-12 which significantly reduces the size of the
global variables in libcmd - there are still some |static| buffers and
"cp.c" causes headaches since I don't know how I can pass a pointer to
the chi
