ist
> Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
>
--
Richard Rondu
Recherche et Developpement
IUT de Cachan - Génie Électrique et Informatique Industrielle 2
--
Return on
ds like a manager from some company... Open source is more
> about: get involved and let's do it.
>
>>
>> (It's too easy to get carried away and type too much on a dvorak
>> keyboard. =P)
>
> If you feel like typing, you might want to give your opinion on the
&g
mobile applications to market and stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
> ___
> Ktechlab-devel mailing list
> Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.so
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> I just did a memcheck run on my torture test circuit (after finishing
> cleaning logicIn of linked list code, and re-writing part of Circuit so
> that it behaves the same as LogicOut). I was totally outraged by the
> results. KTECHLAB HAD LOSED
Hi,
> I'll carry on with the testing. If ktechlab passes my testing, I'll
> push ktechlab on fedora's development repositories.
>
Is it possible to push it to F10 also? I think this would be good for
F10 users (and for me :D)
Thanks,
Richard
> thanks
> chitlesh
>
--
I vote IRC ( channel #ktechlab-devel ) ?
By the way, sorry for the off-topic, but I think this could be a good
idea to have an IRC channel for support / development ( #ktechlab &
#ktechlab-devel? or just one of those?)
Richard
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Julian Bäume wrote:
> hi,
> just t
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:20 PM, P Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:02:38 +0100, Juan De Vincenzo
> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I've been thinking that maybe, a good way to obtain some extra hands
>> for the project would be with an open call for developers which could
>> be carried out on
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Julian Bäume wrote:
> On Monday 09 February 2009 16:35:48 P Zoltan wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:11:41 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
>> >> The idea of integrating it with kdevelop to a greater extent is
>> >> interesting and has a great deal of potential... (wonder
did you took a look at those mailing lists threads?
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200902080304.15219.jul...@svg4all.de&forum_name=ktechlab-devel
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=498dd610.9030...@speakeasy.net&forum_name=ktechlab-devel
Might be u
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Even Gentoo finally pushed KDE4 out into it's unstable stream. It has
> some major problems, for example it couldn't handle both of my monitors
> at once so I had to fire off TWM on my other monitor.
>
> Here are some feature ideas that I want
Are we gonna have a svn repository for updating the changes to qt4 or
we're just gonna send patches/updated files around?
It would be great if we could have one.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:15 PM, P Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:09:33 +0100, Richard Rondu
> wrote:
>
>
Hi,
Well, while we're talking about Qt 4, I would also be glad to help.
I'm quite familiar with Qt 4 (especially with Java but I shouldn't
have any trouble going from Java to C++).
I just recently suscribed to the mailing list in order to see if there
was any work in this direction thanks to this
12 matches
Mail list logo
