On Wednesday 11 February 2009 20:00:42 Juan De Vincenzo wrote:
> I'd like to also say that I'm as well in favor of a redesign or
> rewrite of the code wherever it is necessary, and the reason why I
> didn't started such a task myself is because, how I stated on my first
> e-mail, I'm only in the fi
Hi everyone,
First of all, sorry that it took me a couple of days to reply to this
particular thread, second, thanks a lot for your feedback. I really
appreciate it. =)
I'd like to also say that I'm as well in favor of a redesign or
rewrite of the code wherever it is necessary, and the reason wh
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Julian Bäume wrote:
> On Monday 09 February 2009 16:35:48 P Zoltan wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:11:41 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
>> >> The idea of integrating it with kdevelop to a greater extent is
>> >> interesting and has a great deal of potential... (wonder
On Monday 09 February 2009 16:35:48 P Zoltan wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:11:41 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
> >> The idea of integrating it with kdevelop to a greater extent is
> >> interesting and has a great deal of potential... (wonder if you could
> >> flowpart a C program or something. =P)
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:11:41 +0100, Julian Bäume wrote:
>> The idea of integrating it with kdevelop to a greater extent is
>> interesting and has a great deal of potential... (wonder if you could
>> flowpart a C program or something. =P)
> It won't integrate directly into kdevelop, just use some
On Sunday 08 February 2009 22:39:05 Glen Canaday wrote:
> > I partly broke my gentoo, too, when upgrading from KDE4.1 to 4.2. It was
> > way more easy to install 4.x and remove old KDE3 packets. ;)
>
> I can't compile KDE3 apps, period. Installing the dev libs after I wiped
> clean and went to kubu
> I partly broke my gentoo, too, when upgrading from KDE4.1 to 4.2. It was
> way more easy to install 4.x and remove old KDE3 packets. ;)
I can't compile KDE3 apps, period. Installing the dev libs after I wiped clean
and went to kubuntu 8.10 wrecked my KDE4 builds, so... I started over again.
/m
On Sunday 08 February 2009 21:40:00 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Juan De Vincenzo wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I'm really keen for your feedback. =)
>
> Yes, I'm in favor of a more direct port of Ktechlab to 4.x.
I thought about that. But the more I read in the code, the more I saw the need
of some design changes
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:23:51 Juan De Vincenzo wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Well, after a lot of reading I finally found the time to sit in front
> of the machine and I was able to complete part of the porting. Overall
> the process took around one hour and a half.
The build-system (you started po
Juan De Vincenzo wrote:
[...]
> I'm really keen for your feedback. =)
Yes, I'm in favor of a more direct port of Ktechlab to 4.x.
The idea of integrating it with kdevelop to a greater extent is
interesting and has a great deal of potential... (wonder if you could
flowpart a C program or something
did you took a look at those mailing lists threads?
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=200902080304.15219.jul...@svg4all.de&forum_name=ktechlab-devel
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=498dd610.9030...@speakeasy.net&forum_name=ktechlab-devel
Might be u
Hi there,
Well, after a lot of reading I finally found the time to sit in front
of the machine and I was able to complete part of the porting. Overall
the process took around one hour and a half.
Attached you have a small log file I've created during the process to
document what I was doing. Hope
As far as I know there's an svn repository, but that's where the
currently development version is hosted. It is my understanding that
you can have several branches in the same repository, but I'm not
familiar with that. I will research about it, but maybe it would be
faster if someone already famil
Are we gonna have a svn repository for updating the changes to qt4 or
we're just gonna send patches/updated files around?
It would be great if we could have one.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:15 PM, P Zoltan wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:09:33 +0100, Richard Rondu
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Well, whi
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:09:33 +0100, Richard Rondu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, while we're talking about Qt 4, I would also be glad to help.
> I'm quite familiar with Qt 4 (especially with Java but I shouldn't
> have any trouble going from Java to C++).
>
You should consult with Julian Bäume, he h
Hello everyone,
I have uploaded the partially ported code here:
http://www.gigasize.com/get.php?d=mosmvyvm9pb
Inside of each directory you'll find a portinglog.txt, that's the log
that qt3to4 automatically generates when executed.
Also, this is what's done at the moment:
- Using the am2cmake s
Hi,
Well, while we're talking about Qt 4, I would also be glad to help.
I'm quite familiar with Qt 4 (especially with Java but I shouldn't
have any trouble going from Java to C++).
I just recently suscribed to the mailing list in order to see if there
was any work in this direction thanks to this
I'm sending the e/mail one more time without the attachment, since it
is too big, please don't hesitate to let me know if you want to
receive the file.
Regards,
Juan
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Juan De Vincenzo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a brief intro of myself: I'm a ktechlab enthusiast that, s
Thanks for your feedback.
I've been taking a look at the porting tool and what I understand,
based on what I've been reading[1], is that in order to do it all at
once the whole project should count with a qt project file (*.pro).
AFAIK Ktechlab doesn't use that, so I guess it is a file by file job
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Juan De Vincenzo wrote:
>
> For example a question that comes to my mind now is: would you use the
> qt3toqt4 porting tool or rather rewrite the code around Qt 4?
>
Hello,
I would say, does it take a lot of time to port it with qt3qt4 ?
If it is about 4hrs of work
Hi,
Just a brief intro of myself: I'm a ktechlab enthusiast that, since
I'm just learning to program, I've been only quietly following the
developments of the project, but, since my failed attempt to compile
under KDE 4 a couple of weeks ago (maybe someone remembers the e-mail
I sent? =P) and also
21 matches
Mail list logo
