Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-10-05 Thread santiago gonzalez
Well... comming back to the flowcode in 0.3.7 cuestion. This bug was fixed in trunk (rev 290), but not in 0.3.7 branch. 2009/10/1 P Zoltan > On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:34:22 +0200, santiago gonzalez > wrote: > > > Sorry again... the bug deleting components or closing the circuit > > document > > is

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-30 Thread P Zoltan
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:34:22 +0200, santiago gonzalez wrote: > Sorry again... the bug deleting components or closing the circuit > document > is still there... > I just uncomented the lines in electronicconnector.cpp in the wrong > folder... You can see in valgrind (memory check) that ther

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-30 Thread santiago gonzalez
Sorry again... the bug deleting components or closing the circuit document is still there... I just uncomented the lines in electronicconnector.cpp in the wrong folder... -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Con

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-29 Thread santiago gonzalez
Soryy... my mistake... is the 455 revision looks that the bug dissapear...:) Now ktl don't crashes when deleting components or closing some circuit documents. 2009/9/30 santiago gonzalez > > I don't know exactly what bug are you talking about, i tried revision 450 > (undo commit 447) and now 45

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-29 Thread santiago gonzalez
I don't know exactly what bug are you talking about, i tried revision 450 (undo commit 447) and now 455 and ktl crashes when deleting some components or closing some circuit documents. If this can help, Kcrash always say this: _ [T

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-29 Thread P Zoltan
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:11:55 +0200, Alan Grimes wrote: > P Zoltan wrote: >> Let's start this mail with a famous quote: >> >> "There are two ways to write code: write code so simple there are >> obviously no bugs in it, or write code so complex that there are no >> obvious bugs in it." >> >>

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-29 Thread Alan Grimes
P Zoltan wrote: > Let's start this mail with a famous quote: > > "There are two ways to write code: write code so simple there are > obviously no bugs in it, or write code so complex that there are no > obvious bugs in it." > > It seems that if I revert the commit that has removed the usa

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-29 Thread P Zoltan
Let's start this mail with a famous quote: "There are two ways to write code: write code so simple there are obviously no bugs in it, or write code so complex that there are no obvious bugs in it." It seems that if I revert the commit that has removed the usage QGuardedPtr class in som

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-28 Thread P Zoltan
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:46:42 +0200, santiago gonzalez wrote: > http://arcachofo.users.sourceforge.net/ktl4 I think I found the root of this, but it's not obvious how to fix it. electronicconnector.cpp, at the destructor: "Something else is deleting wires, FIXME, figure out what the deal is

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-24 Thread Alan Grimes
P Zoltan wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:46:42 +0200, santiago gonzalez > wrote: > >> http://arcachofo.users.sourceforge.net/ktl4 > > Bug confirmed. > > Only next week I'll have time to debug this. I never knew "cut traces" even existed!!! =\ All this time I've been cutting whole compone

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-24 Thread santiago gonzalez
2009/9/24 santiago gonzalez > I don't know if this can help you, but i had this warning while compiling: > > flowicndocument.cpp:155: warning: unused parameter 'pos1' > flowicndocument.cpp:155: warning: unused parameter 'pos2' > flowicndocument.cpp:155: warning: unused parameter 'pointList' > > S

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-24 Thread santiago gonzalez
I don't know if this can help you, but i had this warning while compiling: flowicndocument.cpp:155: warning: unused parameter 'pos1' flowicndocument.cpp:155: warning: unused parameter 'pos2' flowicndocument.cpp:155: warning: unused parameter 'pointList' 2009/9/24 P Zoltan > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-24 Thread P Zoltan
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:46:42 +0200, santiago gonzalez wrote: > http://arcachofo.users.sourceforge.net/ktl4 Bug confirmed. Only next week I'll have time to debug this. -- Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Develo

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-22 Thread santiago gonzalez
> > What version do you mean by ktechlab 0.3.7 ? I'm using the svn trunk, and >> it works for me. Could you send the files with problems? >> > For me svn trunk doesn't work in the simulation, looks some kind of conector problem; flowcode works, but simulation is impossible. Instead of explain th

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-21 Thread santiago gonzalez
ktl-0.3.7 from svn branch: http://ktechlab.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ktechlab/branches/ I paste a file, but looks like there is no problem with the flowcode file, the problem is with the code generation.

Re: [Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-21 Thread P Zoltan
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 23:36:50 +0200, santiago gonzalez wrote: > I tried flowcode in ktl-0.3.7 from svn branch and it just doesn't work... > only initialization code is created, all i have is some warnings: > "floating > conection for..." , this for every step i placed. > > I think the file.fl

[Ktechlab-devel] Flowcode in ktl-0.3.7

2009-09-20 Thread santiago gonzalez
I tried flowcode in ktl-0.3.7 from svn branch and it just doesn't work... only initialization code is created, all i have is some warnings: "floating conection for..." , this for every step i placed. I think the file.flowcode is correct, but the code-generation step looks to be broken. This happe