On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:15:27 +0200, Alan Grimes
wrote:
> P Zoltan wrote:
>>> That said, my local version has many meaningless and or experimental
>>> changes that I have not committed. It is quite possible that among
>>> these
>>> are some that are actually important. =\
>
>> Look in connec
P Zoltan wrote:
>> That said, my local version has many meaningless and or experimental
>> changes that I have not committed. It is quite possible that among these
>> are some that are actually important. =\
> Look in connector.cpp, where the moveTo slot is connected to the moved
> (?) signal.
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:56:07 +0200, Alan Grimes
wrote:
>
> I was a bit panicked when I read that subject line given the number of
> bad commits I've made. =0, But thankfully, the latest revision I worked
> on was 503. =P I can move resistors around in 503 just fine.
>
> Wait a minute, my versio
P Zoltan wrote:
> Rev. 505 had a severe bug: the PinNodes won't move together with te item
> associated with them, and Qt was throwing lots of errors in the terminal.
> Now it's fixed. The problem was that Qt takes the parameters of the slots
> strictly, so "const double" != "double".
I wa
Rev. 505 had a severe bug: the PinNodes won't move together with te item
associated with them, and Qt was throwing lots of errors in the terminal.
Now it's fixed. The problem was that Qt takes the parameters of the slots
strictly, so "const double" != "double".
It would be nice if we wo
